BACKGROUND: the genetic and environmental origins of individual differences in specific cognitive abilities in the elderly are poorly understood. One reason is the lack of studies performed in cohorts with normal cognitive functions. OBJECTIVE: to estimate the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors in determining inter-individual variation in neurocognitive abilities in the Italian population. DESIGN: cross-sectional analysis of twin data. SETTING: a sample of older twins with normal cognition from the population-based Italian Twin Registry (ITR). SUBJECTS: twin pairs resident in Rome and born between 1926 and 1940, identified through the ITR in 2002. The final study population included 93 twin pairs. METHODS: subjects underwent neuropsychological tests providing information about different cognitive domains. The contributions of genetic and environmental effects were assessed using standard univariate twin modelling based on linear structural equations. RESULTS: the best-fitting model incorporated additive genetic (A) and unique environmental (E) sources of variance for the following tests: Mini-Mental State Examination (A = 55%), Raven (A = 56%), Attentional Matrices (A = 79%), Copying Drawings (A = 69%) and Story Recall (A = 54%). For Phonological and Semantic Verbal Fluency, the best model included non-additive (D) and unique environmental influences (D = 62 and 54%, respectively). Cigarette smoking was estimated to be negatively associated with the score of Phonological Verbal Fluency. For Token test, the inter-individual variance was entirely due to environmental factors not shared by the twins. CONCLUSION: our data showed that most of the specific cognitive abilities are moderately to highly heritable, and that the environmental factors of relevance for these abilities are those causing within-family differences.
BACKGROUND: the genetic and environmental origins of individual differences in specific cognitive abilities in the elderly are poorly understood. One reason is the lack of studies performed in cohorts with normal cognitive functions. OBJECTIVE: to estimate the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors in determining inter-individual variation in neurocognitive abilities in the Italian population. DESIGN: cross-sectional analysis of twin data. SETTING: a sample of older twins with normal cognition from the population-based Italian Twin Registry (ITR). SUBJECTS: twin pairs resident in Rome and born between 1926 and 1940, identified through the ITR in 2002. The final study population included 93 twin pairs. METHODS: subjects underwent neuropsychological tests providing information about different cognitive domains. The contributions of genetic and environmental effects were assessed using standard univariate twin modelling based on linear structural equations. RESULTS: the best-fitting model incorporated additive genetic (A) and unique environmental (E) sources of variance for the following tests: Mini-Mental State Examination (A = 55%), Raven (A = 56%), Attentional Matrices (A = 79%), Copying Drawings (A = 69%) and Story Recall (A = 54%). For Phonological and Semantic Verbal Fluency, the best model included non-additive (D) and unique environmental influences (D = 62 and 54%, respectively). Cigarette smoking was estimated to be negatively associated with the score of Phonological Verbal Fluency. For Token test, the inter-individual variance was entirely due to environmental factors not shared by the twins. CONCLUSION: our data showed that most of the specific cognitive abilities are moderately to highly heritable, and that the environmental factors of relevance for these abilities are those causing within-family differences.
Authors: Amanda J Cox; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Laura M Raffield; Carl D Langefeld; Barry I Freedman; Jeff D Williamson; Fang-Chi Hsu; Donald W Bowden Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Daniel E Gustavson; Matthew S Panizzon; Jeremy A Elman; Carol E Franz; Asad Beck; Chandra A Reynolds; Kristen C Jacobson; Hong Xian; Rosemary Toomey; Michael J Lyons; William S Kremen Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: William S Kremen; Matthew S Panizzon; Carol E Franz; Kelly M Spoon; Eero Vuoksimaa; Kristen C Jacobson; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Hong Xian; Jeanne M McCaffery; Brinda K Rana; Rosemary Toomey; Ruth McKenzie; Michael J Lyons Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2014-06
Authors: Tiffany A Greenwood; Michal S Beeri; James Schmeidler; Daniel Valerio; Henriette Raventós; Lara Mora-Villalobos; Karla Camacho; José R Carrión-Baralt; Gary Angelo; Laura Almasy; Mary Sano; Jeremy M Silverman Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2011 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Sandra Barral; Joseph H Lee; Sue E Leurgans; Tatiana M Foroud; Robert A Sweet; Neill Graff-Radford; Thomas D Bird; Richard Mayeux; David A Bennett Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2011 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Hilary Bertisch; Dawei Li; Matthew J Hoptman; Lynn E Delisi Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Daniel E Gustavson; Matthew S Panizzon; William S Kremen; Chandra A Reynolds; Shandell Pahlen; Marianne Nygaard; Mette Wod; Vibeke S Catts; Teresa Lee; Margaret Gatz; Carol E Franz Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2021-02-06 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Angela Heck; Christian Vogler; Leo Gschwind; Sandra Ackermann; Bianca Auschra; Klara Spalek; Björn Rasch; Dominique de Quervain; Andreas Papassotiropoulos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 3.240