BACKGROUND: Using echocardiography, perioperative assessment of systolic function by fractional area change (FAC) is questionable in patients suffering from mitral regurgitation (MR). Tei index, an index expressing global cardiac function, has been reported to be unchanged after mitral valve surgery. We tested the hypothesis where the Tei index could be useful in assessing the perioperative cardiac function in patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVR). METHODS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed perioperatively before and after the correction of MR. We compared the impact of the MVR on the left ventricular FAC and the Tei index. FAC was calculated from the transgastric short-axis view and Tei index was determined from the four chambers and deep transgastric views. RESULTS: Two patients were excluded because of poor acoustic windows. FAC significantly decreased after MVR from 53 (9)% to 42 (10)% (P<0.001), while Tei index was unaffected [0.46 (0.16) vs 0.47 (0.17), NS]. A significant relationship was found between the preoperative Tei index and the postoperative FAC (R=-0.64, P<0.001). Moreover, a significant and clinically relevant relationship was determined between the predicted (using preoperative Tei index) and the measured postoperative FAC (R=0.64, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FAC but not the Tei index is influenced by MVR. The preoperative determination of the Tei index allows predicting postoperative FAC and offers the opportunity to identify patients in whom a severe unsuspected systolic dysfunction could render difficult the weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass.
BACKGROUND: Using echocardiography, perioperative assessment of systolic function by fractional area change (FAC) is questionable in patients suffering from mitral regurgitation (MR). Tei index, an index expressing global cardiac function, has been reported to be unchanged after mitral valve surgery. We tested the hypothesis where the Tei index could be useful in assessing the perioperative cardiac function in patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVR). METHODS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed perioperatively before and after the correction of MR. We compared the impact of the MVR on the left ventricular FAC and the Tei index. FAC was calculated from the transgastric short-axis view and Tei index was determined from the four chambers and deep transgastric views. RESULTS: Two patients were excluded because of poor acoustic windows. FAC significantly decreased after MVR from 53 (9)% to 42 (10)% (P<0.001), while Tei index was unaffected [0.46 (0.16) vs 0.47 (0.17), NS]. A significant relationship was found between the preoperative Tei index and the postoperative FAC (R=-0.64, P<0.001). Moreover, a significant and clinically relevant relationship was determined between the predicted (using preoperative Tei index) and the measured postoperative FAC (R=0.64, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FAC but not the Tei index is influenced by MVR. The preoperative determination of the Tei index allows predicting postoperative FAC and offers the opportunity to identify patients in whom a severe unsuspected systolic dysfunction could render difficult the weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass.