Literature DB >> 18640813

Management of upper extremity arterial injuries at an urban level I trauma center.

Randall W Franz1, Robert B Goodwin, Jodi F Hartman, Michelle L Wright.   

Abstract

Although relatively uncommon, upper extremity arterial injuries are serious and may significantly impact the outcome of the trauma patient. Management of upper extremity arterial injuries at an urban level I trauma center was reviewed to determine incidence, assess the current management strategy, and evaluate hospital outcome. Upper extremity trauma patients with arterial injury who presented between January 2005 and December 2006 were included in this retrospective review. Data collected included age, gender, race, mechanism of injury, type of injury, associated upper extremity injuries, concomitant injuries, injury severity score (ISS), diagnostic modalities employed, surgical procedures and interventions, mortality, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Statistical analysis between blunt and penetrating arterial injuries as well as between proximal and distal arterial injuries also was conducted. During a 2-year period, 28 patients with 30 upper extremity arterial injuries were admitted, yielding an incidence of 0.48%. The study population was comprised primarily of young Caucasian males, with a mean ISS of 9.0. The majority (89.3%) of patients suffered concomitant upper extremity injuries. Twenty-two nerve injuries were identified in 16 (57.1%) patients. The most common injury mechanism was cut by glass (39.3%). Arterial injuries were categorized into 18 (60.0%) penetrating and 12 (40.0%) blunt injuries. Involved artery distribution was as follows: 12 (40.0%) brachial, eight (26.7%) ulnar, seven (23.3%) radial, and three (10.0%) axillary. Over half (56.7%) of the injuries resulted from lacerations. Injuries were managed as follows: 14 (46.7%) primary repairs, eight (26.7%) ligations, six (20.0%) saphenous vein graft bypasses, and two (6.7%) endovascular procedures. Eleven (39.3%) patients required intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The overall mean length of hospitalization for these patients was 7.4 days compared to a mean length of hospitalization of 2.0 days for the 17 (44.7%) patients who did not require ICU admission. The overall limb salvage rate was 96.4% as arterial injuries were successfully repaired in 27 of 28 patients. No patients expired and all were discharged home. Equivalent demographics, mechanisms of injury, surgical management approaches, and successful hospital outcomes were demonstrated between penetrating and blunt injuries as well as between proximal and distal arterial injuries. The current management approach, including use of angiography and prompt surgical management, results in successful outcomes after upper extremity arterial injuries and will continue to be utilized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18640813     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  14 in total

1.  Operative exposure and management of axillary vessel injuries.

Authors:  F N Mazzini; T Vu; S Prichayudh; J D Sciarretta; J Chandler; H Lieberman; C Marini; J A Asensio
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Characteristics and treatment of vascular injuries: a review of 387 cases at a Chinese center.

Authors:  Zhui Li; Liang Zhao; Kaizhen Wang; Jun Cheng; Yu Zhao; Wei Ren
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

3.  Multidetector CT and three-dimensional CT angiography of upper extremity arterial injury.

Authors:  Jan Fritz; David T Efron; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-12-11

4.  Non-iatrogenic civilian vascular trauma in a well-defined geographical region in Finland.

Authors:  R Pöyhönen; V Suominen; I Uurto; J Salenius
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic vascular trauma in a district general hospital: a 21-year review.

Authors:  Henry D I De'Ath; Robert B Galland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Ballistic trauma: lessons learned from iraq and afghanistan.

Authors:  Emily H Shin; Jennifer M Sabino; George P Nanos; Ian L Valerio
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  CT-detected traumatic small artery extremity injuries: surgery, embolize, or watch? A 10-year experience.

Authors:  Erik Velez; Andrew M Surman; Sujal M Nanavati; Vishal Kumar; Evan Lehrman; Mark W Wilson; Miles B Conrad
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-11-18

Review 8.  Evidence-based Comprehensive Approach to Forearm Arterial Laceration.

Authors:  Janice N Thai; Jose A Pacheco; David S Margolis; Tianyi Swartz; Brandon Z Massey; John A Guisto; Jordan L Smith; Joseph E Sheppard
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-12-11

9.  Management of traumatic brachial artery injuries: a report on 49 patients.

Authors:  Hasan Ekim; Mustafa Tuncer
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.526

10.  Assessment of Vascular Injuries and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Iraj Baghi; Mohammad Rasool Herfatkar; Leila Shokrgozar; Zahra Poor-Rasuli; Fatemeh Aghajani
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2015-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.