Literature DB >> 18640669

Differential contribution of superior parietal and dorsal-lateral prefrontal cortices in copying.

Bruno B Averbeck1, David A Crowe, Matthew V Chafee, Apostolos P Georgopoulos.   

Abstract

In this study we examined the differential contribution of superior parietal cortex (SPC) and caudal dorsal-lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) to drawing geometrical shapes. Monkeys were trained to draw triangles, squares, trapezoids and inverted triangles while we recorded the activity of small ensembles of neurons in caudal area 46 and areas 5 and 2 of parietal cortex. We analyzed the drawing factors encoded by individual neurons by fitting a step-wise general-linear model using as our dependent variable the firing rate averaged over segments of the produced trajectories. This analysis demonstrated that both cognitive (shape and segment serial position) and motor (maximum speed, position and direction of segment) factors modulated the activity of individual neurons. Furthermore, SPC had an enriched representation of both shape and motor factors, with the motor enrichment being stronger than the shape enrichment. Following this we used the activity in the simultaneously recorded neural ensembles to predict the hand velocity. In these analyses we found that the prediction of the hand velocity was better when we estimated different linear decoding functions for each shape than when we estimated a single function across shapes, although it was a subtle effect. Furthermore, we also found that ensembles of caudal dlPFC neurons carried considerable information about hand velocity, a purely motor factor. However, the SPC ensembles carried more information at the ensemble level as a function of the ensemble size than the caudal dlPFC ensembles, although the differences were not dramatic. Finally, an analysis of the response latencies of individual neurons showed that the caudal dlPFC representation was more sensory than the SPC representation, which was equally sensory and motor. Thus, this neurophysiological evidence suggests that both SPC and caudal dlPFC have a role in drawing, but that SPC plays a larger role in both the cognitive and the motor components.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18640669     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  6 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal neural interactions underlying continuous drawing movements as revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Vassilios N Christopoulos; Arthur C Leuthold; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex Codes Information Relevant for Managing Explore-Exploit Tradeoffs.

Authors:  Vincent D Costa; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  The parietal lobe evolution and the emergence of material culture in the human genus.

Authors:  Emiliano Bruner; Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer; Roberto Caminiti
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Cerebral cortical mechanisms of copying geometrical shapes: a multidimensional scaling analysis of fMRI patterns of activation.

Authors:  Charidimos Tzagarakis; Trenton A Jerde; Scott M Lewis; Kâmil Uğurbil; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Interhemispheric Parietal-Frontal Connectivity Predicts the Ability to Acquire a Nondominant Hand Skill.

Authors:  Benjamin A Philip; Mark P McAvoy; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2021-02-09

6.  Regional variation in phasic dopamine release during alcohol and sucrose self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Tatiana A Shnitko; Donita L Robinson
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 4.418

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.