INTRODUCTION: Inability to accurately determine extracapsular extension (ECE) and neurovascular bundle (NVB) tumor involvement prior to or during radical prostatectomy (RP) remains problematic. Laparoscopic prostatectomy has the additional challenge of lack of tactile tumor assessment. Our goal is to determine the impact of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI) staging upon NVB sparing aggressiveness and the RP surgical margin rate. METHODS: Sixty-two patients who underwent RP (46 laparoscopic and 16 open retropubic) from March 2002 to February 2005 and had preoperative eMRI staging were evaluated to determine the impact of apparent ECE upon NVB sparing aggressiveness and subsequent RP margin positivity. RESULTS: Thirty-four (83%) of 41 pathologic stage T2 tumors and 8 (38%) of 21 pathologic stage T3 tumors were accurately classified by eMRI. Eighty-three percent of eMRI stage T2 classified tumors underwent bilateral NVB sparing, whereas only 55% of laparoscopic (P = 0.09) and 75% of open RP (P = 1.0) tumors classified as eMRI stage T3 underwent bilateral NVB sparing. The overall surgical margin positive rate was 30% for laparoscopic and 25% for open RPs. Pathologic T3 tumors erroneously classified as T2 demonstrated a trend towards greater positive margin rate (54% vs. 13% [P = 0.07], 63% vs. 14% laparoscopic RP [P = 0.12]). Eighty percent of clinical T1c, Gleason score 6, pathologic T3 tumors classified erroneously as T2 by eMRI had positive margins. CONCLUSIONS: The usefulness of endorectal MRI in detecting ECE is limited. Patients with eMRIs suggesting no ECE demonstrated a trend towards more aggressive NVB sparing and an increased positive surgical margin rate at laparoscopic prostatectomy.
INTRODUCTION: Inability to accurately determine extracapsular extension (ECE) and neurovascular bundle (NVB) tumor involvement prior to or during radical prostatectomy (RP) remains problematic. Laparoscopic prostatectomy has the additional challenge of lack of tactile tumor assessment. Our goal is to determine the impact of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI) staging upon NVB sparing aggressiveness and the RP surgical margin rate. METHODS: Sixty-two patients who underwent RP (46 laparoscopic and 16 open retropubic) from March 2002 to February 2005 and had preoperative eMRI staging were evaluated to determine the impact of apparent ECE upon NVB sparing aggressiveness and subsequent RP margin positivity. RESULTS: Thirty-four (83%) of 41 pathologic stage T2 tumors and 8 (38%) of 21 pathologic stage T3 tumors were accurately classified by eMRI. Eighty-three percent of eMRI stage T2 classified tumors underwent bilateral NVB sparing, whereas only 55% of laparoscopic (P = 0.09) and 75% of open RP (P = 1.0) tumors classified as eMRI stage T3 underwent bilateral NVB sparing. The overall surgical margin positive rate was 30% for laparoscopic and 25% for open RPs. Pathologic T3 tumors erroneously classified as T2 demonstrated a trend towards greater positive margin rate (54% vs. 13% [P = 0.07], 63% vs. 14% laparoscopic RP [P = 0.12]). Eighty percent of clinical T1c, Gleason score 6, pathologic T3 tumors classified erroneously as T2 by eMRI had positive margins. CONCLUSIONS: The usefulness of endorectal MRI in detecting ECE is limited. Patients with eMRIs suggesting no ECE demonstrated a trend towards more aggressive NVB sparing and an increased positive surgical margin rate at laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Authors: Matthias C Roethke; Matthias P Lichy; Michaela Kniess; Matthias K Werner; Claus D Claussen; Arnulf Stenzl; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; David Schilling Journal: World J Urol Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jennifer Salerno; Antonio Finelli; Chris Morash; Scott C Morgan; Nicholas Power; Nichola Schieda; Masoom A Haider Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Sasha C Druskin; Jen-Jane Liu; Allen Young; Zhaoyong Feng; Seyed S Dianat; Wesley W Ludwig; Bruce J Trock; Katarzyna J Macura; Christian P Pavlovich Journal: Res Rep Urol Date: 2017-04-18
Authors: Andreas G Wibmer; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Alessandrino; Alexander D J Baur; Lars Boesen; Felipe Boschini Franco; David Bonekamp; Riccardo Campa; Hannes Cash; Violeta Catalá; Sebastien Crouzet; Sounil Dinnoo; James Eastham; Fiona M Fennessy; Kamyar Ghabili; Markus Hohenfellner; Angelique W Levi; Xinge Ji; Vibeke Løgager; Daniel J Margolis; Paul C Moldovan; Valeria Panebianco; Tobias Penzkofer; Philippe Puech; Jan Philipp Radtke; Olivier Rouvière; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Preston C Sprenkle; Clare M Tempany; Joan C Vilanova; Jeffrey Weinreb; Hedvig Hricak; Amita Shukla-Dave Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Erik Rud; Dagmar Klotz; Kristin Rennesund; Eduard Baco; Truls Erik Bjerklund Johansen; Lien My Diep; Aud Svindland; Lars Magne Eri; Heidi B Eggesbø Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Mieszko Kozikowski; Jan Powroźnik; Wojciech Malewski; Szymon Kawecki; Sebastian Piotrowicz; Wojciech Michalak; Łukasz Nyk; Magdalena Gola; Jakub Dobruch Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 3.318