BACKGROUND: This study evaluated trends in adjuvant systemic treatment among breast cancer patients and analyzed the factors on which treatment choice was based. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in 1990-2006 were selected from the registry of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre South (n=8261). The probability of receiving therapy was determined per characteristic for the periods 1990-1997, 1998-2001 and 2002-2006, separately. RESULTS: The use of any adjuvant systemic treatment increased from 37% in 1990-1997 to 51% in 1998-2001 and 53% in 2002-2006 (p for trend < 0.0001). In the period 1990-1997, lymph node status (positive vs. negative: probability ratio (PR=25.8; 95% CI, 16.5-40.4) and age ( 60 vs. 35 years: PR=0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.02) were the main determinants of the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. From 1998 onwards, age remained the most important factor in decreasing the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. During 1990-1997 the use of hormonal therapy was mainly determined by positive lymph node status (PR=35; 95% CI, 25-49) and age ( 70 vs. 35 years: PR=9.3; 95% CI, 4.4-20), whereas positive hormone receptor status mainly affected hormonal therapy use (PR=17; 95% CI, 10-28) in the period 2002-2006. Marked differences were observed between hospitals in the adoption of adjuvant systemic treatment for node-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of patient and tumour characteristics on treatment choice varied over time, reflecting major changes in the Dutch treatment guidelines. Patients older than 70 years received almost no chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated trends in adjuvant systemic treatment among breast cancerpatients and analyzed the factors on which treatment choice was based. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in 1990-2006 were selected from the registry of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre South (n=8261). The probability of receiving therapy was determined per characteristic for the periods 1990-1997, 1998-2001 and 2002-2006, separately. RESULTS: The use of any adjuvant systemic treatment increased from 37% in 1990-1997 to 51% in 1998-2001 and 53% in 2002-2006 (p for trend < 0.0001). In the period 1990-1997, lymph node status (positive vs. negative: probability ratio (PR=25.8; 95% CI, 16.5-40.4) and age ( 60 vs. 35 years: PR=0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.02) were the main determinants of the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. From 1998 onwards, age remained the most important factor in decreasing the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. During 1990-1997 the use of hormonal therapy was mainly determined by positive lymph node status (PR=35; 95% CI, 25-49) and age ( 70 vs. 35 years: PR=9.3; 95% CI, 4.4-20), whereas positive hormone receptor status mainly affected hormonal therapy use (PR=17; 95% CI, 10-28) in the period 2002-2006. Marked differences were observed between hospitals in the adoption of adjuvant systemic treatment for node-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of patient and tumour characteristics on treatment choice varied over time, reflecting major changes in the Dutch treatment guidelines. Patients older than 70 years received almost no chemotherapy.
Authors: Floortje Mols; Tonneke Beijers; Gerard Vreugdenhil; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Carlo La Vecchia; Carlo LaVecchia; Lars Vatten; Anna Gavin; Clarisse Héry; Mary Heanue Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-08-11
Authors: Melvin J Kilsdonk; Boukje Ac van Dijk; Renee Otter; Wim H van Harten; Sabine Siesling Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-08-16 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Deborah N N Lo-Fo-Wong; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Neil K Aaronson; Doris L van Abbema; Mathilda D den Boer; Marjan van Hezewijk; Marcelle Immink; Ad A Kaptein; Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers; Anna K L Reyners; Nicola S Russell; Manon Schriek; Sieta Sijtsema; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Mirjam A G Sprangers Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Y C de Vries; M M G A van den Berg; J H M de Vries; S Boesveldt; J Th C M de Kruif; N Buist; A Haringhuizen; M Los; D W Sommeijer; J H N Timmer-Bonte; H W M van Laarhoven; M Visser; E Kampman; R M Winkels Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Daniël J van der Meer; Iris Kramer; Marissa C van Maaren; Paul J van Diest; Sabine C Linn; John H Maduro; Luc J A Strobbe; Sabine Siesling; Marjanka K Schmidt; Adri C Voogd Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: N Bhoo-Pathy; S Subramaniam; N A Taib; M Hartman; Z Alias; G-H Tan; R I Ibrahim; C-H Yip; H M Verkooijen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Deborah N Lo-Fo-Wong; Hanneke C de Haes; Neil K Aaronson; Doris L van Abbema; Jolien M Admiraal; Mathilda D den Boer; Marjan van Hezewijk; Marcelle Immink; Ad A Kaptein; Marian B Menke-Pluijmers; Nicola S Russell; Manon Schriek; Sieta Sijtsema; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Mirjam A Sprangers Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Deborah N N Lo-Fo-Wong; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Neil K Aaronson; Doris L van Abbema; Mathilda D den Boer; Marjan van Hezewijk; Marcelle Immink; Ad A Kaptein; Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers; Anna K L Reyners; Nicola S Russell; Manon Schriek; Sieta Sijtsema; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Mathilde G E Verdam; Mirjam A G Sprangers Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 3.894