Literature DB >> 18639950

An in vivo comparison of intestinal pH and bacteria as physiological trigger mechanisms for colonic targeting in man.

Emma L McConnell1, Michael D Short, Abdul W Basit.   

Abstract

Targeting the colon for site-specific oral delivery can exploit one of two main physiological triggers; the intestinal pH changes or the increase in bacterial numbers in the distal gut. This study aimed to assess how these triggers compared in vivo to determine which concept provides better colon-specific release. Pellets were prepared using theophylline (model drug) and coated with methacrylic acid/methylmethcrylate co-polymer (Eudragit S [a pH-responsive polymer which dissolves above pH 7]) or amylose/ethylcellulose (a polysaccharide/polymeric mixture which is partially digested by colonic bacteria). The immediate release (uncoated) and the two sets of modified release (coated) pellets were administered to eight healthy fasted volunteers in a three-way crossover study. Drug levels were measured in the plasma, and the transit of the modified release pellets was followed by gamma scintigraphy. The immediate release pellets had T(max) values ranging from 0.5-2 h and bioavailability (AUC) ranging from 24.8-50.7 mcg h/ml. The pH-responsive pellets released drug in seven out of eight subjects. In those subjects in whom drug release occurred, the pellets had variable in vivo performance (T(max) ranging from 5-9 h; AUC 8.8-55.0 mcg h/ml) and drug release started in the small intestine for these pellets. The bacterially-triggered pellets (T(max) 8-10 h; AUC 16.5-47.9 mcg h/ml) were colon-specific; drug was detected in the blood only when the pellets reached the colon and release was more sustained than the pH system. The use of the bacterially-triggered delivery concept provided improved colonic delivery over the pH approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18639950     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  14 in total

1.  Mucus-penetrating budesonide nanosuspension enema for local treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Abhijit A Date; Gilad Halpert; Taarika Babu; Jairo Ortiz; Pranjali Kanvinde; Peter Dimitrion; Janani Narayan; Hannah Zierden; Kalpana Betageri; Olivia Musmanno; Helen Wiegand; Xinglu Huang; Sanjeev Gumber; Justin Hanes; Laura M Ensign
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Oral drug delivery with polymeric nanoparticles: the gastrointestinal mucus barriers.

Authors:  Laura M Ensign; Richard Cone; Justin Hanes
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  miRNAs in gastrointestinal diseases: can we effectively deliver RNA-based therapeutics orally?

Authors:  A K M Nawshad Hossian; Gerardo G Mackenzie; George Mattheolabakis
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  Formulation and development of di-dependent microparticulate system for colon-specific drug delivery.

Authors:  Mayur M Patel
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  The effect of chitosan as internal or external coating on the 5-ASA release from calcium alginate microparticles.

Authors:  Cristián Tapia; Sergio Molina; Alvaro Diaz; Lilian Abugoch; Mario Diaz-Dosque; Fernando Valenzuela; Mehrdad Yazdani-Pedram
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 6.  Impact of gastric and bowel surgery on gastrointestinal drug delivery.

Authors:  Susan Hua; Ephraem C Lye
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.617

7.  Development and Evaluation of pH-Dependent Micro Beads for Colon Targeting.

Authors:  M S Khan; B K Sridhar; A Srinatha
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.975

8.  Engineering of Naproxen Loaded Polymer Hybrid Enteric Microspheres for Modified Release Tablets: Development, Characterization, in silico Modelling and in vivo Evaluation.

Authors:  Hajra Afeera Hameed; Shahzeb Khan; Muhammad Shahid; Riaz Ullah; Ahmed Bari; Syed Saeed Ali; Zahid Hussain; Muhammad Sohail; Shafi Ullah Khan; Thet Thet Htar
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Encapsulation of Liposomes within pH Responsive Microspheres for Oral Colonic Drug Delivery.

Authors:  M J Barea; M J Jenkins; Y S Lee; P Johnson; R H Bridson
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-06-27

Review 10.  Exploring Different Strategies for Efficient Delivery of Colorectal Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Congcong Lin; Huei Leng Helena Ng; Weisan Pan; Hubiao Chen; Ge Zhang; Zhaoxiang Bian; Aiping Lu; Zhijun Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.