Sumaira H Malik1, Neil S Coulson. 1. Institute of Work, Health & Organisations, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. lwxsm5@nottingham.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Over recent years the Internet has become an increasingly popular source of support and information for infertility, with a growing number of online support groups now available to individuals affected by fertility problems. The aims of the present study were therefore to explore the online experiences of individuals accessing infertility support groups via the Internet. METHODS: Ninety-five participants who were recruited from several online infertility support groups completed an online questionnaire containing a series of open-ended questions. Responses to the open-ended questions were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The thematic analysis revealed five recurrent themes, which were labelled: 'unique features of online social support', 'improved relationship with partner', 'reduced sense of isolation', 'information and empowerment', and 'negative aspects of online communities.' CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the majority of participants considered there to be a range of important benefits from accessing online communities. However the results also demonstrate that there are a number of disadvantages to online infertility support groups that may have an impact on the experiences of infertile individuals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Online support groups may provide a valuable forum through which health care professionals can better understand and support the psychosocial needs of individuals experiencing infertility.
OBJECTIVE: Over recent years the Internet has become an increasingly popular source of support and information for infertility, with a growing number of online support groups now available to individuals affected by fertility problems. The aims of the present study were therefore to explore the online experiences of individuals accessing infertility support groups via the Internet. METHODS: Ninety-five participants who were recruited from several online infertility support groups completed an online questionnaire containing a series of open-ended questions. Responses to the open-ended questions were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The thematic analysis revealed five recurrent themes, which were labelled: 'unique features of online social support', 'improved relationship with partner', 'reduced sense of isolation', 'information and empowerment', and 'negative aspects of online communities.' CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the majority of participants considered there to be a range of important benefits from accessing online communities. However the results also demonstrate that there are a number of disadvantages to online infertility support groups that may have an impact on the experiences of infertile individuals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Online support groups may provide a valuable forum through which health care professionals can better understand and support the psychosocial needs of individuals experiencing infertility.
Authors: S Martin; M C Roderick; R Lockridge; M A Toledo-Tamula; A Baldwin; P Knight; P Wolters Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Staci Martin; Kari L Struemph; Alyssa Poblete; Mary Anne Toledo-Tamula; Robin Lockridge; Marie Claire Roderick; Pamela Wolters Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2018-03-02
Authors: Kevin O Hwang; Allison J Ottenbacher; Angela P Green; M Roseann Cannon-Diehl; Oneka Richardson; Elmer V Bernstam; Eric J Thomas Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2009-11-27 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Bum Chul Kwon; Sung-Hee Kim; Sukwon Lee; Jaegul Choo; Jina Huh; Ji Soo Yi Journal: IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.579
Authors: Siobhan Bernadette Laura O'Connell; Eden Noah Gelgoot; Paul Henry Grunberg; Joy Schinazi; Deborah Da Costa; Cindy-Lee Dennis; Zeev Rosberger; Phyllis Zelkowitz Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med Date: 2021-02-11
Authors: Johanna W M Aarts; Marjan J Faber; Anne G den Boogert; Ben J Cohlen; Paul J Q van der Linden; Jan A M Kremer; Willianne L D M Nelen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 5.428