Nick Heather1, David Smailes, Paul Cassidy. 1. Division of Psychology, School of Psychology and Sport Sciences, Northumberland Building, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. nick.heather@unn.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A quick method of assessing readiness to change was needed for a major study of implementing screening and alcohol brief intervention in England. For this purpose, a Readiness Ruler that had been validated among a sample of male college students in the USA was adapted and applied to a sample of excessive drinkers in a general medical practice located in a deprived area of Gateshead, England. METHODS: 72 participants identified as excessive drinkers by health professionals completed a single-item Readiness Ruler, the 12-item Readiness to Change Questionnaire (RCQ) and the AUDIT questionnaire. RESULTS: In terms of concurrent validity, the relationships between the Readiness Ruler, on the one hand, and either stage of change allocation or a dimensional score derived from the RCQ, on the other hand, were highly significant but weaker than expected. When patients who endorsed the "maintenance" point on the Readiness Ruler were excluded from the analysis, the above relationships were considerably strengthened for reasons that are discussed. On this basis and with another small change, a final Readiness Ruler was developed. CONCLUSION: If the validity of the Readiness Ruler is confirmed in subsequent research, a quick and simple way of measuring readiness to change will be available for research or clinical work with alcohol brief interventions.
BACKGROUND: A quick method of assessing readiness to change was needed for a major study of implementing screening and alcohol brief intervention in England. For this purpose, a Readiness Ruler that had been validated among a sample of male college students in the USA was adapted and applied to a sample of excessive drinkers in a general medical practice located in a deprived area of Gateshead, England. METHODS: 72 participants identified as excessive drinkers by health professionals completed a single-item Readiness Ruler, the 12-item Readiness to Change Questionnaire (RCQ) and the AUDIT questionnaire. RESULTS: In terms of concurrent validity, the relationships between the Readiness Ruler, on the one hand, and either stage of change allocation or a dimensional score derived from the RCQ, on the other hand, were highly significant but weaker than expected. When patients who endorsed the "maintenance" point on the Readiness Ruler were excluded from the analysis, the above relationships were considerably strengthened for reasons that are discussed. On this basis and with another small change, a final Readiness Ruler was developed. CONCLUSION: If the validity of the Readiness Ruler is confirmed in subsequent research, a quick and simple way of measuring readiness to change will be available for research or clinical work with alcohol brief interventions.
Authors: Susan E Collins; Andrew J Saxon; Mark H Duncan; Brian F Smart; Joseph O Merrill; Daniel K Malone; T Ron Jackson; Seema L Clifasefi; Jutta Joesch; Richard K Ries Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Derek D Satre; Amy S Leibowitz; Wendy Leyden; Sheryl L Catz; C Bradley Hare; Hannah Jang; Jennifer O Lam; Kendall J Bryant; Constance M Weisner; Stacy A Sterling; Michael Horberg; Paul Volberding; Michael J Silverberg Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Susan E Collins; Seema L Clifasefi; Lonnie A Nelson; Joey Stanton; Silvi C Goldstein; Emily M Taylor; Gail Hoffmann; Victor L King; Alyssa S Hatsukami; Zohar Lev Cunningham; Ellie Taylor; Nigel Mayberry; Daniel K Malone; T Ron Jackson Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2019-03-06
Authors: Brenda M Booth; Katharine E Stewart; Geoffrey M Curran; Ann M Cheney; Tyrone F Borders Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Richard Saitz; Tibor P A Palfai; Debbie M Cheng; Daniel P Alford; Judith A Bernstein; Christine A Lloyd-Travaglini; Seville M Meli; Christine E Chaisson; Jeffrey H Samet Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eileen Kaner; Martin Bland; Paul Cassidy; Simon Coulton; Paolo Deluca; Colin Drummond; Eilish Gilvarry; Christine Godfrey; Nick Heather; Judy Myles; Dorothy Newbury-Birch; Adenekan Oyefeso; Steve Parrott; Katherine Perryman; Tom Phillips; Don Shenker; Jonathan Shepherd Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Dorothy Newbury-Birch; Martin Bland; Paul Cassidy; Simon Coulton; Paolo Deluca; Colin Drummond; Eilish Gilvarry; Christine Godfrey; Nick Heather; Eileen Kaner; Judy Myles; Adenekan Oyefeso; Steve Parrott; Katherine Perryman; Tom Phillips; Don Shenker; Jonathan Shepherd Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Simon Coulton; Katherine Perryman; Martin Bland; Paul Cassidy; Mike Crawford; Paolo Deluca; Colin Drummond; Eilish Gilvarry; Christine Godfrey; Nick Heather; Eileen Kaner; Judy Myles; Dorothy Newbury-Birch; Adenekan Oyefeso; Steve Parrott; Tom Phillips; Don Shenker; Jonathan Shepherd Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-07-03 Impact factor: 2.655