Literature DB >> 18639292

The Pediatric Penile Perception Score: an instrument for patient self-assessment and surgeon evaluation after hypospadias repair.

Daniel M Weber1, Verena B Schönbucher, Markus A Landolt, Rita Gobet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate an instrument that allows assessment and comparison of penile perception of patients, parents and surgeons.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 77 boys 6 to 17 years old who had undergone hypospadias repair were interviewed by a psychologist with a standardized questionnaire concerning penile self-perception with regard to meatus, glans, skin and general appearance. The Pediatric Penile Perception Score was derived from the sum of these 4 items. The results were compared with a control group of age matched boys following inguinal hernia repair. Parents were asked via questionnaire to report the penile appearance of their son using the Pediatric Penile Perception Score. A total of 56 patients accepted standardized photographic documentation, and their pictures were sent for evaluation with the Pediatric Penile Perception Score to 6 blinded urologists.
RESULTS: The Pediatric Penile Perception Score allowed us to assess perception of the genitalia by patients, parents and urologists. Statistical analysis of the Pediatric Penile Perception Score assigned by the urologist revealed good interrater reliability (interclass correlation 0.75 to 0.88) and stability (r = 0.59 to 0.83). Intercorrelation of the items "meatus," "glans" and "skin" with "general appearance" was good among the boys, parents and urologists. Patients with hypospadias expressed high satisfaction with the penile appearance, which did not differ significantly from age matched controls. However, parents and urologists were less satisfied with the penile appearance than were the patients themselves.
CONCLUSIONS: The Pediatric Penile Perception Score is a reliable instrument to assess penile self-perception in children after hypospadias repair, and for appraisal of the surgical result by parents and uninvolved urologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18639292     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

1.  Foreskin reconstruction and preservation of a thin distal urethra: a challenge in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty.

Authors:  Gunter Fasching; Christoph Arneitz; Gabriele Gritsch-Olipp
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Intermediate-Term Followup of Proximal Hypospadias Repair Reveals High Complication Rate.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; David I Chu; Robert W Tenney; Andrew R Morris; Dana A Weiss; Aseem R Shukla; Arun K Srinivasan; Stephen A Zderic; Thomas F Kolon; Douglas A Canning
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  At The Forefront of Penile Surgical Reconstruction: A Bibliometric Study of the 100 Most-Cited Articles.

Authors:  Minliang Wu; Rui Chen; Yalong Xu; Xiaolei Shi; Ruixiang Song; Mengyan Sun; Chunyu Xue; Yuchong Wang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Cosmetic and functional outcomes of two-stage hypospadias repair: an objective scoring evaluation and uroflowmetry.

Authors:  Naser S Hussein; Shapiee Bin Abd Samat; Mohd Arif Kor Abdullah; Mohd Nor Gohar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-06

5.  Comparative outcomes of the tubularized incised plate and transverse island flap onlay techniques for the repair of proximal hypospadias.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Xue-Yi Xue; Xiao-Dong Li; Yong Wei; Qing-Shui Zheng; Tao Jiang; Jin-Bei Huang; Xiong-Lin Sun
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Recent advances in understanding/management of hypospadias.

Authors:  Warren Snodgrass; Nicol Bush
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-11-04

Review 7.  Assessment of outcome in hypospadias surgery - a review.

Authors:  Alexander Springer
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 8.  The psychosexual aspects of hypospadias repair: A review.

Authors:  Christopher M Deibert; Terry W Hensle
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-11-15

Review 9.  Comparison of transverse island flap onlay and tubularized incised-plate urethroplasties for primary proximal hypospadias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dongdong Xiao; Xin Nie; Wenyue Wang; Juan Zhou; Ming Zhang; Zhe Zhou; Yang Zhao; Meng Gu; Zhong Wang; Mujun Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The cosmetic results of a simple method for repairing preputial skin defect in hypospadias.

Authors:  Maryam Ghavami-Adel; Mansour Mollaeean; Nakysa Hooman
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 0.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.