Literature DB >> 18639278

Investigation of a novel degradable ureteral stent in a porcine model.

Boris A Hadaschik1, Ryan F Paterson, Ladan Fazli, Kenneth W Clinkscales, Shalaby W Shalaby, Ben H Chew.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ureteral stents often result in patient morbidity and the potential for a forgotten stent. When the suture tether is detached, a secondary procedure is required for removal. Previous attempts at developing biodegradable ureteral stents have been unsuccessful since those stents were not biocompatible or they failed to degrade in timely fashion. We evaluated a new biodegradable Double-J stent in a porcine model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 Yorkshire pigs were stented unilaterally with a biodegradable Uriprene stent or a standard biostable control stent. Excretory urograms, and blood and urine tests were performed at weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 10. Four animals per group were sacrificed after 2, 4, 7 and 10 weeks to determine stent degradation and obtain samples for pathological evaluation.
RESULTS: Degradable ureteral stents began to degrade at 3 weeks. By weeks 7 and 10, 60% and 100% of the stents, respectively, were fully degraded. There was no significant difference in laboratory parameters or the amount of hydronephrosis between the 2 groups. However, ureteral dilatation was significantly more pronounced in the control group than in the Uriprene group. The novel stent was biocompatible on histological evaluation and it led to significantly less urinary tract infections than in controls.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel Uriprene stents provided drainage similar to that of regular stents and they were completely degraded by 10 weeks. Moreover, these stents resulted in less ureteral dilatation and fewer positive urine cultures. Biocompatibility was good and human trials will be forthcoming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18639278     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Update on ureteral stent technology.

Authors:  Dirk Lange; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-08

Review 2.  Ureteral stent-associated complications--where we are and where we are going.

Authors:  Dirk Lange; Samir Bidnur; Nathan Hoag; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Ureteral stent symptoms and associated infections: a biomaterials perspective.

Authors:  Ben H Chew; Dirk Lange
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization-assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model.

Authors:  Federico Soria; Julia E de La Cruz; Tomás Fernandez; Alberto Budia; Álvaro Serrano; Francisco M Sanchez-Margallo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04

5.  Characterization of nanostructured ureteral stent with gradient degradation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Wang; Hongli Shan; Jixue Wang; Yuchuan Hou; Jianxun Ding; Qihui Chen; Jingjing Guan; Chunxi Wang; Xuesi Chen
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-04-20

6.  Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study.

Authors:  Federico Soria; Julia E de La Cruz; Juan Pablo Caballero-Romeu; Manuel Pamplona; Daniel Pérez-Fentes; Luis Resel-Folskerma; Francisco M Sanchez-Margallo
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 7.  Advances in ureteral stents.

Authors:  Hilary Brotherhood; Dirk Lange; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-09

8.  The Efficacy and Safety of Ureteric Stent Removal with Strings versus No Strings: Which Is Better?

Authors:  Zhenkai Luo; Binbin Jiao; Hang Zhao; Tao Huang; Lin Geng; Guan Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Risks of forgotten double-J ureteric stents after ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Weiming Cheng; Yi-Chun Chiu; Yu-Hua Fan; Shu-Yi Lin; Sheng-Wen Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.