Literature DB >> 18638589

Two-year outcome of patients treated with sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in an unselected population with coronary artery disease (from the REWARDS Registry).

Probal Roy1, Laurent Bonello, Axel de Labriolle, Teruo Okabe, Tina L Pinto Slottow, Daniel H Steinberg, Rebecca Torguson, Kimberly Smith, Zhenyi Xue, Lowell F Satler, Kenneth M Kent, William O Suddath, Augusto D Pichard, Ron Waksman.   

Abstract

Multiple studies comparing sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in patients with coronary artery disease have been performed. Despite these comparisons, it remains uncertain whether a differential in long-term efficacy and safety exists. Unselected patients treated exclusively with 1 drug-eluting stent type were enrolled in the Registry Experience at the Washington Hospital Center with Drug-Eluting Stents. There were 2,099 patients (3,766 lesions) treated with SES and 1,079 patients (1,850 lesions) treated with PES. Patients were followed at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years for the clinical endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and definite and definite/probable stent thrombosis. Patients in the SES group had more dyslipidemia, history of congestive heart failure, and ostial lesions; patients treated with PES had more previous coronary artery bypass surgery, unstable angina, and type C lesions. At 2 years, unadjusted major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (22.6% vs 21.1%, p = 0.3) and target vessel revascularization (13.3% vs 11.2%, p = 0.1) were comparable. The incidence of definite stent thrombosis was higher in the SES group (1.8% vs 0.9%, p = 0.05) driven by early events. Similar results were seen after adjustment for baseline differences: MACE (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9 to 1.3, p = 0.5), definite stent thrombosis (hazard ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 5.2, p = 0.05), and target vessel revascularization (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.4, p = 0.4). The incidence and rate of late stent thrombosis (>30 days) were similar (0.7% vs 0.5%, p = 0.4 and 0.24%/year, both groups, respectively). In conclusion, no major differential in long-term safety or efficacy was detected between SES and PES; both stent types were efficacious in reducing revascularization but were limited by a small continual increase in late stent thrombosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18638589     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.03.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  1 in total

1.  Impact of smoking on the outcome of patients treated with drug-eluting stents: 1-year results from the prospective multicentre German Drug-Eluting Stent Registry (DES.DE).

Authors:  Mohammad A Sherif; Christoph A Nienaber; Ralph Toelg; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab; Volker Geist; Steffen Schneider; Jochen Senges; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Ulrich Tebbe; Gert Richardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.460

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.