Literature DB >> 18638461

Selective effects of auditory stimuli on tactile roughness perception.

Yuika Suzuki1, Jiro Gyoba, Shuichi Sakamoto.   

Abstract

We report two psychophysical experiments designed to investigate the effects of non touch-produced sounds on the tactile perception of roughness and length. Previous studies have demonstrated that the tactile roughness perception of object surfaces is modified by sounds elicited by rubbing the surfaces. In this study, we examined the crossmodal effects of non touch-produced sounds such as white noise (Experiment 1) and pure tones (Experiment 2). Participants touched abrasive paper, synchronizing their touch with changes in the intensity of sounds or with the onset of beeps (control condition), and judged the tactile roughness or length of the stimuli, using the magnitude estimation method. Although the white noise (complex sound) significantly decreased the slope of the roughness estimation function, it did not affect that of the length estimation function. Pure tones had no effect on roughness or length perception. The results revealed that complex sounds selectively affected tactile roughness perception, even when they were seemingly irrelevant to the exploration of the surfaces. We suggest that the processing of complex sounds may be related to the processing of tactile roughness, whereas it is independent of tactile length processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18638461     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Katie H Long; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 2.  The Influence of Auditory Cues on Bodily and Movement Perception.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-17

3.  Temporal frequency channels are linked across audition and touch.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Jonathon B Olenczak; John F Dammann; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The impact of movement sonification on haptic perception changes with aging.

Authors:  C Landelle; J Danna; B Nazarian; M Amberg; F Giraud; L Pruvost; R Kronland-Martinet; S Ystad; M Aramaki; Anne Kavounoudias
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Rhythm perception is shared between audio and haptics.

Authors:  Corentin Bernard; Jocelyn Monnoyer; Michaël Wiertlewski; Sølvi Ystad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective.

Authors:  Nicola Di Stefano; Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Visual motion information modulates tactile roughness perception.

Authors:  Yosuke Suzuishi; Souta Hidaka; Scinob Kuroki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Trilled /r/ is associated with roughness, linking sound and touch across spoken languages.

Authors:  Bodo Winter; Márton Sóskuthy; Marcus Perlman; Mark Dingemanse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.