Literature DB >> 18638238

Home hemodialysis in Australia and New Zealand: practical problems and solutions.

John W M Agar1.   

Abstract

Home hemodialysis, as practiced in Australia and New Zealand, offers patients the return of self-control and self-esteem. It also allows reconnection with family, friends and (re)employment. Though there are emotional and time-related "costs" with home hemodialysis, these center on training time, commitment and patient or family stresses and, if carefully managed and properly resourced, can be overcome for most home-suitable patients. As we believe many center-based hemodialysis patients are home-suitable and that home care is severely under-utilized, assessment techniques to maximize uptake are examined. While patient dropout from home care relates more to staff attitudes than to true home-failure, dropout is minimized by ensuring the patient and not a carer takes full dialysis responsibility with the carer acting as a supporter and not the facilitator. Installation of home equipment is simple and cheap, the financial costs of home hemodialysis being substantially less than those of facility care where salary and infrastructure costs far exceed training, equipment, installation and maintenance costs at home. Home monitoring is not routinely required especially with longer, more frequent regimens-but effective 24-hour on-call nurse and technician cover is essential. Intravenous drug self-administration at home is safe and effective, reducing the need for hospital visits to a 2-3 monthly minimum. The debilitating effects of facility care cannot be over-emphasized while the liberating psychology of a well-supported hemodialysis program is truly satisfying for patient and staff alike.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18638238     DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2008.00292.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemodial Int        ISSN: 1492-7535            Impact factor:   1.812


  3 in total

1.  Associations of frequency and duration of patient-doctor contact in hemodialysis facilities with mortality.

Authors:  Takehiko Kawaguchi; Angelo Karaboyas; Bruce M Robinson; Yun Li; Shunichi Fukuhara; Brian A Bieber; Hugh C Rayner; Vittorio E Andreucci; Ronald L Pisoni; Friedrich K Port; Hal Morgenstern; Tadao Akizawa; Rajiv Saran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Factors Associated With Discontinuation of Home Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Kurnik Seshasai; Nandita Mitra; C Michael Chaknos; Jiaqi Li; Christopher Wirtalla; Dan Negoianu; Joel D Glickman; Laura M Dember
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 3.  Clinical, patient-related, and economic outcomes of home-based high-dose hemodialysis versus conventional in-center hemodialysis.

Authors:  Nicos Mitsides; Sandip Mitra; Tom Cornelis
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2016-07-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.