Literature DB >> 18638234

What happened in Finland to increase home hemodialysis?

Eero O Honkanen1, Virpi M Rauta.   

Abstract

Finland is geographically a rather large country with a relatively sparse population (5.3 million). Home hemodialysis (HHD) was started in Helsinki 40 years ago and in the early years it was only used in selected patients. However, by the late 1980s HHD almost disappeared owing to the advent of CAPD and new HD centers. Towards the end of the 1990s, it became evident that PD had limitations and new ways had to be found to individualize HD, improve the outcome, increase capacity, and limit the growth of costs of HD. After careful planning, HHD was reinstituted at the Helsinki University Hospital in 1998 and since then the program has grown steadily. By December 31, 2007, altogether 163 patients had started at home. This has required changes in the predialysis program where the "home first" policy was adopted. Other important features include close cooperation with other nephrological centers as well as centralized HHD training that also supports more remote hospitals. Since then this therapy has been started in several other academic and in some smaller hospitals, and at the end of last year about 4% of all Finnish dialysis patients (n=1.600) were on HHD (prevalence 11.8/million). In the Helsinki metropolitan area this treatment is the most economical modality (estimated annual global costs euro37.000), comparable to self-care satellite HD and CAPD. A successful HHD program requires a well-organized predialysis program, a highly motivated multidisciplinary team, and well-developed training networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18638234     DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2008.00289.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemodial Int        ISSN: 1492-7535            Impact factor:   1.812


  7 in total

Review 1.  Intensive home haemodialysis: benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Karthik K Tennankore; Christopher T Chan; Simon P Curran
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  How to overcome barriers and establish a successful home HD program.

Authors:  Bessie A Young; Christopher Chan; Christopher Blagg; Robert Lockridge; Thomas Golper; Fred Finkelstein; Rachel Shaffer; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Multipass haemodialysis: a novel dialysis modality.

Authors:  James Goya Heaf; Mette Axelsen; Robert Smith Pedersen
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Clinician beliefs and attitudes about home haemodialysis: a multinational interview study.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Suetonia Palmer; Braden Manns; Jonathan C Craig; Marinella Ruospo; Letizia Gargano; David W Johnson; Jörgen Hegbrant; Måns Olsson; Steven Fishbane; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Trends in home dialysis use differ among age categories in past two decades: A Dutch registry study.

Authors:  Anna A Bonenkamp; Tiny Hoekstra; Marc H Hemmelder; Anita van Eck van der Sluijs; Alferso C Abrahams; Frans J van Ittersum; Brigit C van Jaarsveld
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 6.  A Global Overview of the Impact of Peritoneal Dialysis First or Favored Policies: An Opinion.

Authors:  Frank Xiaoqing Liu; Xin Gao; Gary Inglese; Piyatida Chuengsaman; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Alex Yu
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Nephrologists' perspectives on dialysis treatment: results of an international survey.

Authors:  Richard J Fluck; Denis Fouque; Robert S Lockridge
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.388

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.