Literature DB >> 18638154

Climbing Mount Efficiency--small steps, not giant leaps towards higher cloning success in farm animals.

Björn Oback1.   

Abstract

Despite more than a decade of research efforts, farm animal cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is still frustratingly inefficient. Inefficiency manifests itself at different levels, which are currently not well integrated. At the molecular level, it leads to widespread genetic, epigenetic and transcriptional aberrations in cloned embryos. At the organismal level, these genome-wide abnormalities compromise development of cloned foetuses and offspring. Specific molecular defects need to be causally linked to specific cloned phenotypes, in order to design specific treatments to correct them. Cloning efficiency depends on the ability of the nuclear donor cell to be fully reprogrammed into an embryonic state and the ability of the enucleated recipient cell to carry out the reprogramming reactions. It has been postulated that reprogrammability of the somatic donor cell epigenome is influenced by its differentiation status. However, direct comparisons between cells of divergent differentiation status within several somatic lineages have found no conclusive evidence for this. Choosing somatic stem cells as donors has not improved cloning efficiency, indicating that donor cell type may be less critical for cloning success. Different recipient cells, on the other hand, vary in their reprogramming ability. In bovine, using zygotes instead of oocytes has increased cloning success. Other improvements in livestock cloning efficiency include better coordinating donor cell type with cell cycle stage and aggregating cloned embryos. In the future, it will be important to demonstrate if these small increases at every step are cumulative, adding up to an integrated cloning protocol with greatly improved efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18638154     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01192.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim        ISSN: 0936-6768            Impact factor:   2.005


  7 in total

Review 1.  Recent advancements in cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Atsuo Ogura; Kimiko Inoue; Teruhiko Wakayama
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Pluripotent stem cells and livestock genetic engineering.

Authors:  Delia A Soto; Pablo J Ross
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Epigenetic modification with trichostatin A does not correct specific errors of somatic cell nuclear transfer at the transcriptomic level; highlighting the non-random nature of oocyte-mediated reprogramming errors.

Authors:  Sayyed Morteza Hosseini; Isabelle Dufort; Julie Nieminen; Fariba Moulavi; Hamid Reza Ghanaei; Mahdi Hajian; Farnoosh Jafarpour; Mohsen Forouzanfar; Hamid Gourbai; Abdol Hossein Shahverdi; Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani; Marc-André Sirard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  The aggregation of four reconstructed zygotes is the limit to improve the developmental competence of cloned equine embryos.

Authors:  Andrés Gambini; Adrian De Stefano; Romina Jimena Bevacqua; Florencia Karlanian; Daniel Felipe Salamone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cytoplasmic Injection of Zygotes to Genome Edit Naturally Occurring Sequence Variants Into Bovine Embryos.

Authors:  Jingwei Wei; Brigid Brophy; Sally-Ann Cole; Jannis Moormann; Jens Boch; Gӧtz Laible
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Optimized production of transgenic buffalo embryos and offspring by cytoplasmic zygote injection.

Authors:  Fanli Meng; Hui Li; Xiaoli Wang; Guangsheng Qin; Björn Oback; Deshun Shi
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-20

7.  Efficient Generation of Transgenic Buffalos (Bubalus bubalis) by Nuclear Transfer of Fetal Fibroblasts Expressing Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein.

Authors:  Fenghua Lu; Chan Luo; Nan Li; Qingyou Liu; Yingming Wei; Haiying Deng; Xiaoli Wang; Xiangping Li; Jianrong Jiang; Yanfei Deng; Deshun Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.