AIMS: Indisulam and carboplatin have shown synergistic activity in preclinical studies. In a dose escalation study of the combination, a treatment delay was frequently required in a 3-weekly regimen to allow recovery from myelosuppression from previous cycles. A 4-weekly regimen was better tolerated, but had a decreased dose-intensity which may compromise efficacy. The aims of this study were (i) to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to describe the myelosuppressive effect of the combination, and (ii) to use this model to select a dosing regimen for Phase II evaluation. METHODS: Sixteen patients were treated at four different dose levels of indisulam (1-h infusion on day 1) and carboplatin (30-min infusion on day 2). Pharmacokinetic data were analysed with nonlinear mixed effects modelling. A semiphysiological model describing chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression characterized the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and the haematological toxicity of indisulam and carboplatin. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the tolerability and dose-intensity for 3-weekly and 4-weekly treatment regimens. RESULTS: The PK-PD model described the pharmacokinetics and the myelosuppressive effect of indisulam and carboplatin. The risk of a treatment delay at cycle 2 due to myelosuppression was unacceptably high (34-65%) in a 3-weekly regimen for various dose levels (350-600 mg m(-2) indisulam in combination with carboplatin to achieve an AUC of 4-6 mg min(-1) ml(-1)). This risk was acceptable for a 4-weekly regimen (9-24%), which is in line with the clinical study results. CONCLUSIONS: This PK-PD study supports the selection of indisulam 500 mg m(-2) and a dose of carboplatin to achieve an AUC of 6 mg min(-1) ml(-1) in a 4-weekly regimen as the recommended dose for future studies.
AIMS: Indisulam and carboplatin have shown synergistic activity in preclinical studies. In a dose escalation study of the combination, a treatment delay was frequently required in a 3-weekly regimen to allow recovery from myelosuppression from previous cycles. A 4-weekly regimen was better tolerated, but had a decreased dose-intensity which may compromise efficacy. The aims of this study were (i) to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to describe the myelosuppressive effect of the combination, and (ii) to use this model to select a dosing regimen for Phase II evaluation. METHODS: Sixteen patients were treated at four different dose levels of indisulam (1-h infusion on day 1) and carboplatin (30-min infusion on day 2). Pharmacokinetic data were analysed with nonlinear mixed effects modelling. A semiphysiological model describing chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression characterized the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and the haematological toxicity of indisulam and carboplatin. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the tolerability and dose-intensity for 3-weekly and 4-weekly treatment regimens. RESULTS: The PK-PD model described the pharmacokinetics and the myelosuppressive effect of indisulam and carboplatin. The risk of a treatment delay at cycle 2 due to myelosuppression was unacceptably high (34-65%) in a 3-weekly regimen for various dose levels (350-600 mg m(-2) indisulam in combination with carboplatin to achieve an AUC of 4-6 mg min(-1) ml(-1)). This risk was acceptable for a 4-weekly regimen (9-24%), which is in line with the clinical study results. CONCLUSIONS: This PK-PD study supports the selection of indisulam 500 mg m(-2) and a dose of carboplatin to achieve an AUC of 6 mg min(-1) ml(-1) in a 4-weekly regimen as the recommended dose for future studies.
Authors: Charlotte van Kesteren; Anthe S Zandvliet; Mats O Karlsson; Ron A A Mathôt; Cornelis J A Punt; Jean-Pierre Armand; Eric Raymond; Alwin D R Huitema; Christian Dittrich; Herlinde Dumez; Henri H Roché; Jean-Pierre Droz; Miroslav Ravic; S Murray Yule; Jantien Wanders; Jos H Beijnen; Pierre Fumoleau; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Corine Ekhart; Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jeany M Rademaker-Lakhai; Mirjam Crul; Lot Zuur; Paul Baas; Jos H Beijnen; Yvonne J W Simis; Nico van Zandwijk; Jan H M Schellens Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anthe S Zandvliet; Alwin D R Huitema; William Copalu; Yasuhide Yamada; Tomohide Tamura; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Elena Soto; Ron J Keizer; Iñaki F Trocóniz; Alwin D R Huitema; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Jantien Wanders; Josep María Cendrós; Rosendo Obach; Concepción Peraire; Lena E Friberg; Mats O Karlsson Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Kevin Moreau; Muireann Coen; Andrew X Zhang; Fiona Pachl; M Paola Castaldi; Goran Dahl; Helen Boyd; Clay Scott; Pete Newham Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Chiara Fornari; Lenka Oplustil O'Connor; Carmen Pin; Aaron Smith; James W T Yates; S Y Amy Cheung; Duncan I Jodrell; Jerome T Mettetal; Teresa A Collins Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2019-10-20