Literature DB >> 18637804

Evaluation of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma patients by fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction: the prognostic impact of achieving molecular response.

Pilar Martínez-Sánchez1, Laura Montejano, Maria Eugenia Sarasquete, Ramón García-Sanz, Elena Fernández-Redondo, Rosa Ayala, María Angeles Montalbán, Rafael Martínez, José García Laraña, Adrian Alegre, Belen Hernández, Juan José Lahuerta, Joaquín Martínez-López.   

Abstract

This study aimed to standardize a simple molecular method for evaluating the response to treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) patients after high dose chemotherapy. Fifty three patients enrolled in the GEM2000 protocol were studied for minimal residual disease (MRD) using both fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (F-PCR) and flow cytometry. Most patients had achieved complete remission or very good response after autologous stem cell transplantation. The molecular analysis of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements at diagnosis and during the follow-up was carried out by F-PCR according to the Biomed-2 protocols. F-PCR could be used in 91% of the patients and the results were similar to flow cytometry. F-PCR was able to identify a group of patients with a better prognosis [progression-free survival (PFS) 67.86% in patients with negative F-PCR vs. 28%; P = 0.001], even amongst patients who achieved a complete response with negative immunofixation (PFS 75% vs. 25%; P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified the F-PCR result as the only variable to show a prognostic value when PFS was analysed. F-PCR of DHJ and light chain rearrangements of immunoglobulin genes is a feasible method for evaluating MRD in MM patients after intensive therapy. Achieving molecular response by F-PCR shows prognostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18637804     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07263.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  16 in total

1.  Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Nikhil C Munshi; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Minimal residual disease testing after stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A M Sherrod; P Hari; C A Mosse; R C Walker; R F Cornell
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  The current status of minimal residual disease assessment in myeloma.

Authors:  S K Kumar; S V Rajkumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Nikhil C Munshi; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Kenneth C Anderson; Paola Neri; Bruno Paiva; Mehmet Samur; Meletios Dimopoulos; Margarita Kulakova; Annette Lam; Mahmoud Hashim; Jianming He; Bart Heeg; Jon Ukropec; Jessica Vermeulen; Sarah Cote; Nizar Bahlis
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-12-08

5.  A CD138-independent strategy to detect minimal residual disease and circulating tumour cells in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Barbara Muz; Pilar de la Puente; Feda Azab; Micah John Luderer; Justin King; Ravi Vij; Abdel Kareem Azab
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  A QA Program for MRD Testing Demonstrates That Systematic Education Can Reduce Discordance Among Experienced Interpreters.

Authors:  Michael Keeney; Brent L Wood; Benjamin D Hedley; Joseph A DiGiuseppe; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Elisabeth Paietta; Gerard Lozanski; Adam C Seegmiller; Bruce W Greig; Aaron C Shaver; Lata Mukundan; Howard R Higley; Caroline C Sigman; Gary Kelloff; J Milburn Jessup; Michael J Borowitz
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.058

7.  Busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m2 versus melphalan 200 mg/m2 as conditioning regimens for autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients included in the PETHEMA/GEM2000 study.

Authors:  Juan José Lahuerta; Maria Victoria Mateos; Joaquin Martínez-López; Carlos Grande; Javier de la Rubia; Laura Rosiñol; Anna Sureda; José García-Laraña; Joaquín Díaz-Mediavilla; Miguel T Hernández-García; Dolores Carrera; Joan Besalduch; Felipe de Arriba; Albert Oriol; Lourdes Escoda; Javier García-Frade; Concepción Rivas-González; Adrían Alegre; Joan Bladé; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  Critical evaluation of ASO RQ-PCR for minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. A comparative analysis with flow cytometry.

Authors:  N Puig; M E Sarasquete; A Balanzategui; J Martínez; B Paiva; H García; S Fumero; C Jiménez; M Alcoceba; M C Chillón; E Sebastián; L Marín; M A Montalbán; M V Mateos; A Oriol; L Palomera; J de la Rubia; M B Vidriales; J Bladé; J J Lahuerta; M González; J F S Miguel; R García-Sanz
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Juan J Lahuerta; François Pepin; Marcos González; Santiago Barrio; Rosa Ayala; Noemí Puig; María A Montalban; Bruno Paiva; Li Weng; Cristina Jiménez; María Sopena; Martin Moorhead; Teresa Cedena; Immaculada Rapado; María Victoria Mateos; Laura Rosiñol; Albert Oriol; María J Blanchard; Rafael Martínez; Joan Bladé; Jesús San Miguel; Malek Faham; Ramón García-Sanz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Methods and role of minimal residual disease after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Marco Ladetto; Sebastian Böttcher; Nicolaus Kröger; Michael A Pulsipher; Peter Bader
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.