Literature DB >> 1863686

A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures.

W R Atchley1, B K Hall.   

Abstract

How 'complex' or composite morphological structures like the mammalian craniomandibular region arise during development and how they are altered during evolution are two major unresolved questions in biology. Herein, we have described a model for the development and evolution of complex morphological structures. The model assumes that natural selection acts upon an array of phenotypes generated by variation in a variety of underlying genetic and epigenetic controlling factors. Selection refines the integration of the various morphogenetic components during ontogeny in order to produce a functioning structure and to adapt the organisms to differing patterns of environmental heterogeneity. The model was applied to the development and evolution of the mammalian mandible (which is used as a paradigm of complex morphological structures). The embryology of the mandible was examined in detail in order to identify the fundamental developmental units which are necessary to assemble the final morphological structure. The model is quite general since equivalent units exist for the development of many other biological structures. This model could be applied to many other developing morphological structures as well as other groups of organisms. For example, it can be applied to cell parameters during Drosophila development (Atchley, 1987). The model as discussed in this paper assumes that morphological changes in the mandible result from evolutionary changes in its underlying developmental units. The developmental units relate to characteristics of cellular condensations which are produced from the differentiation of embryonic neural crest cells. The developmental units include: the number of stem cells in preskeletal condensations (n), the time of initiation of condensation formation (t), the fraction of cells that is mitotically active within a condensation (f), the rate of division of these cells (r), and their rate of cell death (d). These units and their derivative structures are discussed in terms of types of tissue differentiation (chondrogenesis, osteogenesis, primary/secondary osteogenesis, intramembranous/endochondral ossification) and growth properties of major morphological regions of the mandible. Variation in these five units provides the developmental basis for ontogenetic and phylogenetic modification of mandibular morphology. We have discussed how these developmental units are influenced by (a) the cell lineage from which they arise, (b) epithelial-mesenchymal (inductive tissue) interactions, (c) regulation of cell differentiation, and (d) extrinsic factors such as muscles, teeth and hormones. Evidence was provided that variation in mandibular morphology is heritable, subject to modification by natural selection, and that divergence among different genetic stocks has apparently occurred through changes in these developmental units and their derivative structures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1863686     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1991.tb01138.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  96 in total

1.  Is the genotype-phenotype map modular? A statistical approach using mouse quantitative trait loci data.

Authors:  J G Mezey; J M Cheverud; G P Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Hominoid systematics: the soft evidence.

Authors:  D Pilbeam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg; Larry J Leamy; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The membranous skeleton: the role of cell condensations in vertebrate skeletogenesis.

Authors:  B K Hall; T Miyake
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1992-07

5.  Hedgehog-dependent proliferation drives modular growth during morphogenesis of a dermal bone.

Authors:  Tyler R Huycke; B Frank Eames; Charles B Kimmel
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Discriminant study of the development of the mandibular units in a neural reference system.

Authors:  R Curien; M Braun; M Perez; P Bravetti; H Coqueugniot
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation.

Authors:  S Ivan Perez; Valeria Bernal; Paula N Gonzalez
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  The influence of three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffolds on the osteogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Laura A Smith; Xiaohua Liu; Jiang Hu; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Myc and Max: molecular evolution of a family of proto-oncogene products and their dimerization partner.

Authors:  W R Atchley; W M Fitch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genetics of Skeletal Evolution in Unusually Large Mice from Gough Island.

Authors:  Michelle D Parmenter; Melissa M Gray; Caley A Hogan; Irene N Ford; Karl W Broman; Christopher J Vinyard; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.