Literature DB >> 18636418

Identifying patterns of adverse event reporting for four members of the angiotensin II receptor blockers class of drugs: revisiting the Weber effect.

Mara A McAdams1, Laura A Governale, Lynette Swartz, Tarek A Hammad, Gerald J Dal Pan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the evidence for temporal reporting patterns, such as the Weber effect, in spontaneous post-marketing adverse event (AE) reports submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for four members of the angiotensin II receptor blockers drug class (ARBs).
METHODS: For losartan, valsartan, irbesartan, and candesartan, we evaluated temporal trends in reporting for the total number of AE reports, serious AE reports, and direct reports from consumers or health care providers (direct reports) to FDA. Reporting patterns were considered consistent with the Weber effect when the peak occurred 2 years after US marketing and the number of reports declined thereafter. We tabulated the number of reports by year since the first report. We adjusted the total number of reports, number of serious AE reports, and number of direct reports by the number of US dispensed prescriptions.
RESULTS: There were no clear temporal reporting patterns for the total number of reports, direct reports, or serious AE reports. We observed a consistent trend for the adjusted number of direct and serious AE reports. The adjusted number was highest in the first year and continually decreased over time for all four ARBs. For the adjusted total number of reports, the decline was not constant over time.
CONCLUSION: A characteristic temporal pattern in the adjusted number of reports, in which the adjusted number was highest in the first year and declined thereafter, was identified. However, we did not observe a pattern consistent with the Weber effect for these four ARBs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18636418     DOI: 10.1002/pds.1633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  21 in total

1.  Trends of reporting of 'serious'vs. 'non-serious' adverse drug reactions over time: a study in the French PharmacoVigilance Database.

Authors:  Guillaume Moulis; Agnès Sommet; Geneviève Durrieu; Haleh Bagheri; Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre; Jean-Louis Montastruc
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Profiling cumulative proportional reporting ratios of drug-induced liver injury in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Authors:  Allen D Brinker; Jenna Lyndly; Joseph Tonning; David Moeny; Jonathan G Levine; Mark I Avigan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Can Disproportionality Analysis of Post-marketing Case Reports be Used for Comparison of Drug Safety Profiles?

Authors:  Christiane Michel; Emil Scosyrev; Michael Petrin; Robert Schmouder
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis with antiepileptic drugs: An analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

Authors:  Eric P Borrelli; Erica Y Lee; Andrew M Descoteaux; Stephen J Kogut; Aisling R Caffrey
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 5.  Noncholestatic acute hepatocellular injury following candesartan administration.

Authors:  Jan Antonio Lammel-Lindemann; Eduardo Flores-Villalba; Alexandro Jose Martagón; Eduardo DeObeso-Gonzalez; Francisco Puente-Gallegos
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Diuretic use, increased serum urate levels, and risk of incident gout in a population-based study of adults with hypertension: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort study.

Authors:  Mara A McAdams DeMarco; Janet W Maynard; Alan N Baer; Allan C Gelber; J Hunter Young; Alvaro Alonso; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-01

7.  Adverse event reporting patterns of newly approved drugs in the USA in 2006: an analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data.

Authors:  Pankdeep Chhabra; Xing Chen; Sheila R Weiss
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Adverse Events Associated With Radium-223 in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Disproportionality Analysis of FDA Data Reflecting Worldwide Utilization.

Authors:  Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Randall C Shults; Michael J Connor; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 9.  Data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Sakaeda; Akiko Tamon; Kaori Kadoyama; Yasushi Okuno
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Antihypertensive drugs and erectile dysfunction as seen in spontaneous reports, with focus on angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers.

Authors:  Elisabet Ekman; Staffan Hägg; Anders Sundström; Viktoria Werkström
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2010-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.