Literature DB >> 18636391

Integrated disinfection by-products research: salmonella mutagenicity of water concentrates disinfected by chlorination and ozonation/postchlorination.

Larry D Claxton1, Rex Pegram, Kathleen M Schenck, Jane Ellen Simmons, Sarah H Warren.   

Abstract

Although chemical disinfection of drinking water is a highly protective public health practice, the disinfection process is known to produce toxic contaminants. Epidemiological studies associate chlorinated drinking water with quantitatively increased risks of rectal, kidney, and bladder cancer. One study found a significant exposure-response association between water mutagenicity and relative risk for bladder and kidney cancer. A number of studies found that several types of disinfection processes increase the level of mutagens detected by the Salmonella assay. As part of a comprehensive study to examine chlorinated and ozonated/postchlorinated drinking water for toxicological contaminants, the Salmonella mutagenicity assay was used to screen both volatile and nonvolatile organic components. The assay also compared the use of reverse osmosis and XAD resin procedures for concentrating the nonvolatile components. Companion papers provide the results from other toxicological assays and chemical analysis of the drinking water samples. The volatile components of the ozonated/postchlorinated and chlorinated water samples and a trihalomethane mixture were mutagenic to a Salmonella tester strain transfected with a rat theta-class glutathione S-transferase and predominantly nonmutagenic in the control strain. In this study, the nonvolatile XAD concentrate of the untreated water possessed a low level of mutagenic activity. However, compared to the levels of mutagenicity in the finished water XAD concentrates, the contribution from the settled source water was minimal. The mutagenicity seen in the reverse osmosis concentrates was < 50% of that seen in the XAD concentrates. Overall, mutagenic responses were similar to those observed in other North American studies and provide evidence that the pilot plant produced disinfection by-products similar to that seen in other studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18636391     DOI: 10.1080/15287390802182508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  5 in total

Review 1.  Future challenges to protecting public health from drinking-water contaminants.

Authors:  Eileen A Murphy; Gloria B Post; Brian T Buckley; Robert L Lippincott; Mark G Robson
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  What's in the pool? A comprehensive identification of disinfection by-products and assessment of mutagenicity of chlorinated and brominated swimming pool water.

Authors:  Susan D Richardson; David M DeMarini; Manolis Kogevinas; Pilar Fernandez; Esther Marco; Carolina Lourencetti; Clara Ballesté; Dick Heederik; Kees Meliefste; A Bruce McKague; Ricard Marcos; Laia Font-Ribera; Joan O Grimalt; Cristina M Villanueva
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Prospective power calculations for the Four Lab study of a multigenerational reproductive/developmental toxicity rodent bioassay using a complex mixture of disinfection by-products in the low-response region.

Authors:  Cheryl A Dingus; Linda K Teuschler; Glenn E Rice; Jane Ellen Simmons; Michael G Narotsky
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Toxicity warning and online monitoring of disinfection by-products in water by electroautotrophic biocathode sensors.

Authors:  Chengmei Liao; Lili Tian; Ziyuan Wang; Xuemei Zhu; Yilian Han; Tian Li; Xin Wang
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 12.545

Review 5.  Evaluating Evidence for Association of Human Bladder Cancer with Drinking-Water Chlorination Disinfection By-Products.

Authors:  Steve E Hrudey; Lorraine C Backer; Andrew R Humpage; Stuart W Krasner; Dominique S Michaud; Lee E Moore; Philip C Singer; Benjamin D Stanford
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 6.393

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.