Marivel Davila1, Stephanie L McFall, Diana Cheng. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA. davilam@uthscsa.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Among childbearing Latinas, higher acculturation has been found to be significantly associated with increased risk for mental health problems, although these findings have been inconsistent. The aims of this study are to assess and compare the prevalence of elevated depressive symptoms among pregnant and postpartum U.S.- and Mexican-born Latinas, and to describe the relation of elevated depressive symptoms and acculturation indicators. METHODS: A convenience sample of 439 pregnant and postpartum Latinas attending Public Health Clinics in San Antonio, Texas was screened for depressive symptoms using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale. Women with a score of 21 or greater were classified as having elevated depressive symptoms. Sociodemographic data, including birth country and language of interview, were collected as indicators of acculturation. RESULTS: 21% of the sample had moderate depressive symptoms; 15% met the threshold for high depressive symptoms. Bivariate analysis showed Latinas who were U.S.-born, single, preferred English or were pregnant were more likely to express elevated levels of depressive symptoms. Being U.S.-born, pregnant and single was significantly associated with moderate levels of depressive symptoms in logistic regression analyses controlling for other variables in the model. Controlling for other variables, being pregnant and single was significantly associated with high levels of depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Higher acculturation, pregnancy and single status were positively associated with elevated depressive symptoms. Screening for depression during pregnancy is important for this population group, given Latinas' high rates of fertility and births to single women, particularly among more acculturated, U.S.-born Latinas.
OBJECTIVES: Among childbearing Latinas, higher acculturation has been found to be significantly associated with increased risk for mental health problems, although these findings have been inconsistent. The aims of this study are to assess and compare the prevalence of elevated depressive symptoms among pregnant and postpartum U.S.- and Mexican-born Latinas, and to describe the relation of elevated depressive symptoms and acculturation indicators. METHODS: A convenience sample of 439 pregnant and postpartum Latinas attending Public Health Clinics in San Antonio, Texas was screened for depressive symptoms using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale. Women with a score of 21 or greater were classified as having elevated depressive symptoms. Sociodemographic data, including birth country and language of interview, were collected as indicators of acculturation. RESULTS: 21% of the sample had moderate depressive symptoms; 15% met the threshold for high depressive symptoms. Bivariate analysis showed Latinas who were U.S.-born, single, preferred English or were pregnant were more likely to express elevated levels of depressive symptoms. Being U.S.-born, pregnant and single was significantly associated with moderate levels of depressive symptoms in logistic regression analyses controlling for other variables in the model. Controlling for other variables, being pregnant and single was significantly associated with high levels of depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Higher acculturation, pregnancy and single status were positively associated with elevated depressive symptoms. Screening for depression during pregnancy is important for this population group, given Latinas' high rates of fertility and births to single women, particularly among more acculturated, U.S.-born Latinas.
Authors: K A Yonkers; S M Ramin; A J Rush; C A Navarrete; T Carmody; D March; S F Heartwell; K J Leveno Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Linda J Luecken; Keith A Crnic; Nancy A Gonzales; Laura K Winstone; Jennifer A Somers Journal: Biol Psychol Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 3.251
Authors: R Jeanne Ruiz; C Nathan Marti; Rita Pickler; Christina Murphey; Joel Wommack; Charles E L Brown Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Yessenia Castro; Lorraine R Reitzel; Michael S Businelle; Darla E Kendzor; Carlos A Mazas; Yisheng Li; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; David W Wetter Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Dalia Alhasanat-Khalil; Carmen Giurgescu; Ramona Benkert; Judith Fry-McComish; Dawn P Misra; Hossein Yarandi Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2019-12
Authors: Tamara E Lewis Johnson; Camille A Clare; Jennifer E Johnson; Melissa A Simon Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 2.681