Literature DB >> 18636278

Peritoneal membrane recruitment in rats: a micro-computerized tomography (muCT) study.

Laure Bergua1, Elodie Breton, Philippe Choquet, Mariette Barthelmebs, Borje Haraldson, Jean-Jacques Helwig, André Constantinesco, Michel Fischbach.   

Abstract

The peritoneal contact surface area (PCSA), which represents the area parameter in the mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC), is a crucial marker in the evaluation of peritoneal dialysis effectiveness. However, the capacity to recruit a larger PCSA has only been rarely demonstrated in vivo and, in most cases, changes in MTAC are interpreted as permeability changes and not as surface area variations. Here, we report the use of micro-computerized tomography (muCT) for the measurement of PCSA changes to various fill volumes. Using this three-dimensional imaging method, PCSA was measured in vivo in 26 healthy Wistar rats receiving intraperitoneally increasing fill volumes of peritoneal dialysis solutions: 5 mL (group 1, n = 8), 10 mL (group 2, n = 8) and 15 mL (group 3, n = 10) per 100 g of body weight. A non-ionic iodinated contrast agent was added to the dialysis solution in order to distinguish the intraperitoneal dialysis solutions from soft tissues. The normalized PCSA/weight ratio (cm(2)/g) increased with fill volume: 1.12 +/- 0.10 cm(2)/g (range 0.98-1.25) in group 1; 1.74 +/- 0.08 cm(2)/g (range 1.64-1.87) in group 2; 2.13 +/- 0.09 cm(2)/g(range 1.90-2.30) in group 3. With this muCT method, PCSA recruited in vivo with a 10 mL/100 g fill volume was in the range 94-107%) of ex vivo total peritoneal surface area (evPSA), as calculated with the Kuzlan's formula. With a 15 mL/100 g fill volume, the in vivo-measured PCSA, the exchange surface area, surpassed the evPSA (range 113-139%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18636278     DOI: 10.1007/s00467-008-0904-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  15 in total

1.  Optimal volume prescription for children on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  M Fischbach; J Terzic; S Menouer; B Haraldsson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  The peritoneal membrane in peritoneal dialysis patients: estimation of its functional surface area by applying stereologic methods to computerized tomography scans.

Authors:  A Chagnac; P Herskovitz; T Weinstein; S Elyashiv; J Hirsh; I Hammel; U Gafter
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Improving contact area between the peritoneum and intraperitoneal therapeutic solutions.

Authors:  Michael F Flessner; Joanne Lofthouse; El Rasheid Zakaria
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Effect of peritoneal dialysis fluid composition on peritoneal area available for exchange in children.

Authors:  Michel Fischbach; Joëlle Terzic; Sylvie Chauvé; Vincent Laugel; Audrey Muller; Börje Haraldsson
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 5.  The transport barrier in intraperitoneal therapy.

Authors:  Michael F Flessner
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2005-03

Review 6.  Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis in children: consider the membrane for optimal prescription.

Authors:  Michel Fischbach; Celine Dheu; Laure Seugé-Dargnies; Jean François Delobbe
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Increasing peritoneal contact area during dialysis improves mass transfer.

Authors:  Michael F Flessner; Joanne Lofthouse; Angela Williams
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Dynamic changes of the total pore area available for peritoneal exchange in children.

Authors:  Michel Fischbach; Börje Haraldsson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  In vivo peritoneal surface area measurement in rats by micro-computed tomography (microCT).

Authors:  Elodie Breton; Philippe Choquet; Laure Bergua; Mariette Barthelmebs; Börje Haraldsson; Jean-Jacques Helwig; André Constantinesco; Michel Fischbach
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Relationship between body size, fill volume, and mass transfer area coefficient in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  P Keshaviah; P F Emerson; E F Vonesh; J C Brandes
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 10.121

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of peritoneal capacity for peritoneal dialysis after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Min Hyun Cho; Hyun Hee Hwang; Ye Jee Shim; Cheol Woo Ko; Yong-Lim Kim; Gab Chul Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  The impact of dialysis solution biocompatibility on ultrafiltration and on free water transport in rats.

Authors:  Gaëlle Aubertin; Philippe Choquet; Céline Dheu; André Constantinesco; Charline Ratomponirina; Ariane Zaloszyc; Jutta Passlick-Deetjen; Michel Fischbach
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Ascites-induced compression alters the peritoneal microenvironment and promotes metastatic success in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Marwa Asem; Allison Young; Carlysa Oyama; Alejandro ClaureDeLaZerda; Yueying Liu; Matthew J Ravosa; Vijayalaxmi Gupta; Andrea Jewell; Dineo Khabele; M Sharon Stack
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.