Literature DB >> 18636268

Preliminary results in cochlear implant surgery without antromastoidectomy and with atraumatic electrode insertion: the endomeatal approach.

Victor Slavutsky1, Luis Nicenboim.   

Abstract

A surgical approach using the external auditory canal and the round window as a natural access pathway for cochlear implant positioning, the endomeatal approach, is described. This approach avoids performing an antromastoidectomy, the subsequent posterior tympanotomy and the promontorial cochleostomy. The endomeatal approach also allows an optimal insertion plane for electrode array atraumatic insertion through the round window.The technique was developed and practiced in 35 fresh temporal bones and then it was applied in ten patients. This surgery has an endomeatal first stage, which begins with a stapedectomy-like tympanomeatal flap. This flap allows an easy access to scala tympani via round window niche. The internal part of a groove is drilled on the posterior wall of the EAC. The groove is parallel to the EAC axis and starts in its inner border. Once the endomeatal stage is completed, a standard retroauricular approach is performed, in order to make the receptor-stimulator well and to complete the groove externally, until it connects the middle ear with the external mastoid surface. A flat second well is drilled in front of the first one to lodge the remaining electrode lead. In small children this well is deepened. The electrode array is introduced in the scala tympani through the RW and located into the groove. The electrode is covered and fixed inside the groove with bone paté. The extra length of the electrode lead is located in the second well and the receptor-stimulator is fixed in its well. The ground electrode is placed under the periosteum, the retroauricular incision is sutured, the tympanomeatal flap is restored and a dressing is placed into the EAC. Surgical time was significantly shorter than in standard approach. There were neither surgical nor healing complications. Electrode insertion was easy and complete and functional results were adequate. The goal of this approach is to avoid antromastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy, which are replaced by the EAC groove. It is faster and safer, eliminating the risk of facial nerve injury. It also allows a better access to the round window, with a less traumatic electrode insertion, suitable for "soft surgery" performing. It may advantageously replace the classical transmastoideal approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18636268     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0768-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  17 in total

1.  Suprameatal approach: new surgical approach for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J Kronenberg; L Migirov; T Dagan
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Topographical relationships among the facial nerve, chorda tympani nerve and round window with special reference to the approach route for cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  M Hamamoto; G Murakami; A Kataura
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  'Veria operation': cochlear implantation without a mastoidectomy and a posterior tympanotomy. A new surgical technique.

Authors:  T Kiratzidis
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000

4.  Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited.

Authors:  Peter S Roland; Charles G Wright; Brandon Isaacson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The mastoid as a functional rate-limiter of middle ear pressure change.

Authors:  William J Doyle
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Cochlear implantation without mastoidectomy: the pericanal electrode insertion technique.

Authors:  R Häusler
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Cochlear implant soft surgery: fact or fantasy?

Authors:  N L Cohen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  The surgery for multiple-electrode cochlear implantations.

Authors:  G M Clark; B C Pyman; Q R Bailey
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 1.469

9.  Our extra-scalar operating method of cochlear implantation. Experience with 46 cases.

Authors:  P Banfai; S Kubik; G Hortmann
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1984

10.  Facial nerve paralysis following cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Jose N Fayad; Georges B Wanna; Jennifer N Micheletto; Simon C Parisier
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  11 in total

1.  Impact of the surgical experience on cochleostomy location: a comparative temporal bone study between endaural and posterior tympanotomy approaches for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Clair Vandersteen; Thomas Demarcy; Coralie Roger; Eric Fontas; Charles Raffaelli; Nicholas Ayache; Hervé Delingette; Nicolas Guevara
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Endomeatal approach in cochlear implant surgery in a patient with small mastoid cavity and procident lateral sinus.

Authors:  Francesco Galletti; Francesco Freni; Francesco Gazia; Bruno Galletti
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-06-06

3.  Endoscopic cochlear implant procedure.

Authors:  Daniele Marchioni; Alberto Grammatica; Matteo Alicandri-Ciufelli; Elisabetta Genovese; Livio Presutti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Cochlear implantation through the round window with a straight slotted electrode array: optimizing the surgical procedure.

Authors:  Thierry Mom; Aurélie Bachy; Aubry Houette; Yoann Pavier; Rémy Pastourel; Jean Gabrillargues; Nicolas Saroul; Laurent Gilain; Paul Avan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Combined posterior tympanotomy/endomeatal access in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Antonio Della Volpe; Italo Cantore; Gerardo Nolè; Paola Valente; Alfonso Maria Varricchio; Michela Santandrea; Valentina Santandrea; Rocco Cantore
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Flap outcome using "c" shaped and "new" incisions in pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  M Ajalloueyan; S Amirsalari; Sh Radfar; A Tavallaee; S Khoshini
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 0.611

7.  Endoscope-Assisted Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Enis Alpin Güneri; Yüksel Olgun
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  Modified transcanal cochlear implantation in CHARGE syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Hsieh; Chuan-Hung Sun; Wei-Lin Lin; Giselle L Gotamco; Chuan-Jen Hsu; Hung-Pin Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Waheed El-Anwar; Ahmed Shaker ElAassar; Yaser Ahmad Foad
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-23

10.  Cochlear Implant Surgery: Endomeatal Approach versus Posterior Tympanotomy.

Authors:  Francesco Freni; Francesco Gazia; Victor Slavutsky; Enrique Perello Scherdel; Luis Nicenboim; Rodrigo Posada; Daniele Portelli; Bruno Galletti; Francesco Galletti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.