Literature DB >> 18635388

Hazards, risks and safety of diagnostic ultrasound.

Francis A Duck1.   

Abstract

The safety of exposure to diagnostic ultrasound is evaluated using a structured approach to risk assessment, based on the acoustic output of present ultrasound scanners. Thermal hazard is described, the magnitude and probability of temperature rise is reviewed, and the severity of harm from any outcome is reviewed. Similar assessments are made separately for acoustic cavitation and gas-body effects, which have previously been considered together. Finally, radiation pressure is considered in a similar manner. In each case, means to minimize the risk are suggested where appropriate. The highest risks are associated with the use of gas-bubble contrast agents. It is concluded that there is a medium risk associated with trans-cranial Doppler use, and that this use of ultrasound deserves more detailed safety review. The risks associated with the current practice of obstetric ultrasound are low. Whilst the severity of radiation pressure as a hazard is low, it is always present. Little is known about any associated cell responses and so the associated risk cannot be evaluated.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18635388     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  10 in total

1.  Are ultrasound-guided ophthalmic blocks injurious to the eye? A comparative rabbit model study of two ultrasound devices evaluating intraorbital thermal and structural changes.

Authors:  Howard D Palte; Steven Gayer; Esdras Arrieta; Eric Scot Shaw; Izuru Nose; Elizabete Lee; Kristopher L Arheart; Sander Dubovy; David J Birnbach; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Safety and bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Gail ter Haar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Mitigation of bone loss with ultrasound induced dynamic mechanical signals in an OVX induced rat model of osteopenia.

Authors:  Suzanne L Ferreri; Roger Talish; Titi Trandafir; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Neuromodulation Management of Chronic Neuropathic Pain in The Central Nervous system.

Authors:  Kai Yu; Xiaodan Niu; Bin He
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 18.808

5.  Evaluation of ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis using custom liposomes in a model of retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Walid F Abdallah; Hitenkumar Patel; Edward G Grant; Bruno Diniz; Gerald J Chader; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Are some people suffering as a result of increasing mass exposure of the public to ultrasound in air?

Authors:  T G Leighton
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.704

7.  Double-Strand Breaks in Genome-Sized DNA Caused by Ultrasound.

Authors:  Rinko Kubota; Yusuke Yamashita; Takahiro Kenmotsu; Yuko Yoshikawa; Kenji Yoshida; Yoshiaki Watanabe; Tadayuki Imanaka; Kenichi Yoshikawa
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.102

8.  Ultrasound biosafety: Knowledge and opinions of health practitioners who perform obstetric scans in South Africa.

Authors:  Salome E Mashiane; Barbara van Dyk; Yasmin Casmod
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2019-10-17

Review 9.  Ultrasound Neuromodulation: A Review of Results, Mechanisms and Safety.

Authors:  Joseph Blackmore; Shamit Shrivastava; Jerome Sallet; Chris R Butler; Robin O Cleveland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Improvement of light penetration in biological tissue using an ultrasound-induced heating tunnel.

Authors:  Zong-Han Hsieh; Ching-Hsiang Fan; Yi-Ju Ho; Meng-Lin Li; Chih-Kuang Yeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.