OBJECTIVE: To investigate the distribution of psychological characteristics and pain reporting among women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome (VVS). METHODS: In this exploratory study, 109 women with VVS completed a battery of questionnaires to assess pain with intercourse and psychological characteristics (e.g. somatization, anxiety, distress). The distribution of these characteristics was compared, first with a conventional binary classification schema (primary and secondary) and subsequently with a 3-category schema (primary, latent primary, secondary). RESULTS: Severity of pain with intercourse did not differ among the subgroups using either classification schema. Women with primary VVS consistently showed higher levels of somatization, anxiety, and distress compared with those with secondary VVS. Using a 3-tiered classification system, we found no difference between latent primary diagnosis and the other 2 groups (primary and secondary). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the critical need for research on subtype definition and the role of psychological factors in VVS.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the distribution of psychological characteristics and pain reporting among women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome (VVS). METHODS: In this exploratory study, 109 women with VVS completed a battery of questionnaires to assess pain with intercourse and psychological characteristics (e.g. somatization, anxiety, distress). The distribution of these characteristics was compared, first with a conventional binary classification schema (primary and secondary) and subsequently with a 3-category schema (primary, latent primary, secondary). RESULTS: Severity of pain with intercourse did not differ among the subgroups using either classification schema. Women with primary VVS consistently showed higher levels of somatization, anxiety, and distress compared with those with secondary VVS. Using a 3-tiered classification system, we found no difference between latent primary diagnosis and the other 2 groups (primary and secondary). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the critical need for research on subtype definition and the role of psychological factors in VVS.
Authors: Luda Diatchenko; Andrea G Nackley; Gary D Slade; Kanokporn Bhalang; Inna Belfer; Mitchell B Max; David Goldman; William Maixner Journal: Pain Date: 2006-07-11 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Luda Diatchenko; Amy D Anderson; Gary D Slade; Roger B Fillingim; Svetlana A Shabalina; Tomas J Higgins; Swetha Sama; Inna Belfer; David Goldman; Mitchell B Max; Bruce S Weir; William Maixner Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2006-07-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Gloria A Bachmann; Raymond Rosen; Vivian W Pinn; Wulf H Utian; Charletta Ayers; Rosemary Basson; Yitzchak M Binik; Candace Brown; David C Foster; John M Gibbons; Irwin Goldstein; Alessandra Graziottin; Hope K Haefner; Bernard L Harlow; Susan Kellogg Spadt; Sandra R Leiblum; Robin M Masheb; Barbara D Reed; Jack D Sobel; Christin Veasley; Ursula Wesselmann; Steven S Witkin Journal: J Reprod Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 0.142
Authors: Denali K Dahl; Ashlyn N Whitesell; Preetika Sharma-Huynh; Panita Maturavongsadit; Rima Janusziewicz; Ryan J Fox; Henry T Loznev; Brian Button; Allison N Schorzman; William Zamboni; Jisun Ban; Stephanie A Montgomery; Erin T Carey; S Rahima Benhabbour Journal: Int J Pharm Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 5.875