Literature DB >> 18634954

Prevalence and prediction of difficult intubation in maxillofacial surgery patients.

Aysegul Mine Tuzuner-Oncul1, Zuhal Kucukyavuz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The failure to maintain a patent airway after the induction of general anesthesia is a major concern for anesthesiologists. For securing the airway, tracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy remains the method of choice in most cases. However, direct laryngoscopic intubation is difficult in 1% to 4%, and impossible in 0.05% to 0.35%, of patients who have seemingly normal airways. This study sought to determine the prevalence of difficult intubation in maxillofacial surgery patients, and to evaluate the usefulness of various predictive tests for difficult intubation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 208 patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery. During the preoperative visit, patients were examined in terms of the test of Mallampati et al (Can Anaesth Soc J 32:429, 1985), thyromental distance, sternomental distance, and interincisal distance. Direct laryngoscopic grading, as defined by Cormack and Lehane (Anesthesia 39:1105, 1984), was recorded for each patient. An intubation of "no difficulty" was noted when the tube was inserted into the fully visualized larynx with little effort on the first attempt.
RESULTS: Intubation was possible in all patients. Combinations of different predictive tests resulted in higher sensitivity. Among all test types, that of Cormack and Lahene was thought to exhibit the highest sensitivity and positive predictive values when used alone. The prevalence of difficult intubation in our group of maxillofacial surgery patients was 15.4%. It may be concluded that a combination of predictive variables can be used to improve sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that combining the Mallampati test with other instruments of measurement resulted in higher sensitivity than when either test was used alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18634954     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of inter incisal mouth opening for airway maintenance in oral submucous fibrosis.

Authors:  Navin Shah; Jay Shah; Amit Mahajan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-02-25

2.  Intubation techniques: preferences of maxillofacial trauma surgeons.

Authors:  Mehul R Jaisani; Leeza Pradhan; Balkrishna Bhattarai; Alok Sagtani
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-08-26

3.  Securing the Airway in Maxillofacial Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review of Techniques.

Authors:  Akshilkumar Patel; Robert Saadi; Jessyka G Lighthall
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-08-17

4.  Video-Assisted Intubating Stylet Technique for Difficult Intubation: A Case Series Report.

Authors:  Pei-Jiuan Tsay; Chih-Pin Yang; Hsiang-Ning Luk; Jason Zhensheng Qu; Alan Shikani
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15

5.  Optimal effect-site concentration of remifentanil for minimizing cardiovascular changes caused by fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Kim; Hyun-Wook Jeon; Tae-Kyun Kim; Seung-Hoon Baek; Ji-Uk Yoon; Ji-Young Yoon
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-12-31

6.  A Novel Approach to Fiberoptic Intubation in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Andrew Robert Emery; Olga Saniukovich; Angela Lu Lang; Richard John Tannyhill; Jingping Wang
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Acoustic features as novel predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in orthognathic surgery: an observational study.

Authors:  Ming Xia; Shuang Cao; Ren Zhou; Jia-Yi Wang; Tian-Yi Xu; Zhi-Kai Zhou; Yan-Min Qian; Hong Jiang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-09

8.  Awareness among anesthesia residents pertaining to various intubation techniques in craniofacial surgery: A questionnaire study.

Authors:  Malti Tuli; Shreyas Orvakonde; T R Shrinivas; Jyothsna Manchikalapudi; Dhananjay Rathod; Jignaben Patel
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 9.  Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients.

Authors:  Dominik Roth; Nathan L Pace; Anna Lee; Karen Hovhannisyan; Alexandra-Maria Warenits; Jasmin Arrich; Harald Herkner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-15

10.  Comparison of five methods in predicting difficult laryngoscopy: Neck circumference, neck circumference to thyromental distance ratio, the ratio of height to thyromental distance, upper lip bite test and Mallampati test.

Authors:  Azim Honarmand; Mohammadreza Safavi; Ahmad Yaraghi; Mohammadali Attari; Mehdi Khazaei; Majid Zamani
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2015-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.