AIM: To determine the prevalence of different etiological factors of dentin hypersensitivity in patients and to provide information on their association with dentin hypersensitivity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-nine patients (17 male, 12 female) suffering from pain of dentin hypersensitivity were recruited to participate in the study. A relevant history was taken and dentin hypersensitivity confirmed by using air-blast and tactile stimuli. RESULTS: All patients were right-handed. The left side of the mouth showed a preponderance of gingival recession, abrasion, abfraction, and erosion while more teeth on the right side showed attrition. Gingival recession and attrition were common among the molars, abrasions among the molars and premolars, abfraction among the premolars, while erosive lesions were predominantly found among the incisors. A total of 911 teeth were examined in the 29 subjects presenting with dentin hypersensitivity. The following conditions were found to be associated with the dentin hypersensitivity: 43 of 117 teeth (36.8%) with gingival recession; 41 of 99 teeth (41.4%) with attrition; 40 of 67 teeth (59.7%) with abrasion; 16 of 25 teeth (64%) with abfraction; and 32 teeth had erosive lesions all associated with hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: Gingival recessions followed by attrition were the most commonly found etiological factors leading to dentin hypersensitivity. Erosive lesions were mostly associated with dentin hypersensitivity. A statistically significant relationship exists between dentin hypersensitivity, tooth wear lesions, and gingival recession. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides clinical evidence supporting the notion of dentin hypersensitivity being a tooth wear phenomenon. Therefore, successful preventive and management strategies for sufferers of dentin hypersensitivity must take into consideration causal factors for tooth wear and gingival recession.
AIM: To determine the prevalence of different etiological factors of dentin hypersensitivity inpatients and to provide information on their association with dentin hypersensitivity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-nine patients (17 male, 12 female) suffering from pain of dentin hypersensitivity were recruited to participate in the study. A relevant history was taken and dentin hypersensitivity confirmed by using air-blast and tactile stimuli. RESULTS: All patients were right-handed. The left side of the mouth showed a preponderance of gingival recession, abrasion, abfraction, and erosion while more teeth on the right side showed attrition. Gingival recession and attrition were common among the molars, abrasions among the molars and premolars, abfraction among the premolars, while erosive lesions were predominantly found among the incisors. A total of 911 teeth were examined in the 29 subjects presenting with dentin hypersensitivity. The following conditions were found to be associated with the dentin hypersensitivity: 43 of 117 teeth (36.8%) with gingival recession; 41 of 99 teeth (41.4%) with attrition; 40 of 67 teeth (59.7%) with abrasion; 16 of 25 teeth (64%) with abfraction; and 32 teeth had erosive lesions all associated with hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: Gingival recessions followed by attrition were the most commonly found etiological factors leading to dentin hypersensitivity. Erosive lesions were mostly associated with dentin hypersensitivity. A statistically significant relationship exists between dentin hypersensitivity,tooth wear lesions, and gingival recession. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides clinical evidence supporting the notion of dentin hypersensitivity being a tooth wear phenomenon. Therefore, successful preventive and management strategies for sufferers of dentin hypersensitivity must take into consideration causal factors for tooth wear and gingival recession.
Authors: Mary A S de-Melo; Vanara F Passos; Jose J Alves; Eduardo B Barros; Sérgio L Santiago; Lidiany K A Rodrigues Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2010-11-20 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Joana Cunha-Cruz; John C Wataha; Lisa J Heaton; Marilynn Rothen; Martin Sobieraj; JoAnna Scott; Joel Berg Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: André Barkhordarian; Reem Ajaj; Manisha H Ramchandani; Gary Demerjian; Riana Cayabyab; Sohrab Danaie; Nora Ghodousi; Natasha Iyer; Nicole Mahanian; Linda Phi; Amy Giroux; Ercolano Manfrini; Negoita Neagos; Muniza Siddiqui; Olivia S Cajulis; Xenia M C Brant; Paul Shapshak; Francesco Chiappelli Journal: Patholog Res Int Date: 2011-05-21
Authors: Ashley P Barlow; Jane He; Cindy Tian; Peter Jeffery; Stephen C Mason; Bao-Jun Tai; Han Jiang; Gareth D Rees; Min Quan Du Journal: Int J Dent Date: 2012-12-06