Literature DB >> 18633323

Young adults' use and output level settings of personal music systems.

Peter Torre1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There are growing concerns over noise exposure via personal music system use by young adults. One purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of personal music system use and the listening patterns associated with these systems in a large sample of young adults. A second purpose of this study was to measure the dB SPL in the ear canal of young adults while they blindly set the volume of a personal music system to four settings.
DESIGN: In the first study, the personal music system use survey was completed by 1016 students at various locations on the San Diego State University campus. Questions included sex, age, ethnicity, race, and whether or not they used a personal music system. Students who answered Yes to using a personal music system were instructed to complete the remaining 11 closed-set questions. These questions dealt with type of earphones used with the system, most common listening environment, length of time per day the system was used, and the volume setting. The differences between women and men and across ethnicity and race were evaluated for the questions. In the second study, a probe microphone placed in the ear canal of 32 participants was used to determine the dB SPL of four loudness categories at which the participants blindly set the level of a personal music system: low, medium or comfortable, loud, and very loud.
RESULTS: In study 1, over 90% of the participants who completed the survey reported using a personal music system. Over 50% of those who use a personal music system reported listening between 1 and 3 hrs and almost 90% reported listening at either a medium or loud volume. Men were significantly more likely to report listening to their system for a longer duration compared with women and more likely to report listening at a very loud volume. There was a trend for Hispanic or Latino students to report listening for longer durations compared with Not Hispanic or Latino students, but this difference was not statistically significant. Black or African American students were significantly more likely to report listening to their personal music system between 3 and 5 hrs and more than 5 hrs and to report listening at a very loud volume compared with other racial groups. In study 2, the mean dB SPL values for low, medium or comfortable, loud, and very loud were 62.0, 71.6, 87.7, and 97.8 dB SPL, respectively. Men set the level of very loud significantly higher than women.
CONCLUSIONS: It is clear that a vast majority of young adults who completed the personal music system use survey listen to a system using earphones. Most of the respondents listen between 1 and 3 hrs a day at a medium or loud volume. Based on the probe microphone measurement results, the volume settings for reported durations may not be hazardous for hearing. Long-term use of personal music systems, however, in combination with other noise exposures (i.e., recreational, occupational), and their effect on hearing remains a question for additional research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18633323     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31817e7409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  24 in total

1.  Evidence of hearing loss in a 'normally-hearing' college-student population.

Authors:  C G Le Prell; B N Hensley; K C M Campbell; J W Hall; K Guire
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Digital music exposure reliably induces temporary threshold shift in normal-hearing human subjects.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Shawna Dell; Brittany Hensley; James W Hall; Kathleen C M Campbell; Patrick J Antonelli; Glenn E Green; James M Miller; Kenneth Guire
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of bone-conducted music on swimming performance.

Authors:  Angela R Tate; Chris Gennings; Regina A Hoffman; Andrew P Strittmatter; Sheldon M Retchin
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Assessment of knowledge of harmful effects and exposure to recreational music in college students of delhi: a cross sectional exploratory study.

Authors:  Neelima Gupta; Arun Sharma; P P Singh; Abhishek Goyal; Rahul Sao
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-07-10

5.  Assessment of Noise Exposure to Children: Considerations for the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Susan Marie Viet; Michael Dellarco; Dorr G Dearborn; Richard Neitzel
Journal:  J Pregnancy Child Health       Date:  2014-10

6.  Exposures to transit and other sources of noise among New York City residents.

Authors:  Richard L Neitzel; Robyn R M Gershon; Tara P McAlexander; Lori A Magda; Julie M Pearson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Epidemiology of firearm and other noise exposures in the United States.

Authors:  Jay M Bhatt; Harrison W Lin; Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Amplitude-modulation detection by recreational-noise-exposed humans with near-normal hearing thresholds and its medium-term progression.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Personal Listening Devices in Australia: Patterns of Use and Levels of Risk.

Authors:  Megan Gilliver; Jenny Nguyen; Elizabeth F Beach; Caitlin Barr
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-10-10

10.  Otoacoustic emissions before and after listening to music on a personal player.

Authors:  Bartosz Trzaskowski; W Wiktor Jędrzejczak; Edyta Piłka; Magdalena Cieślicka; Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.