Literature DB >> 18632774

Canadian treatment optimization recommendations (TOR) as a predictor of disease breakthrough in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with interferon beta-1a: analysis of the PRISMS study.

M S Freedman1, F G Forrestal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early intervention with an effective disease-modifying drug (DMD) offers the best chance of limiting the inflammatory process that contributes to irreversible axonal damage correlating with disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). It is equally important to ascertain fairly quickly whether patients are responding positively to the choice of therapy to allow time for either a treatment modification or a switch in treatment, a process we termed "treatment optimization". Various treatment optimization recommendations (TOR) have been proposed to help decide when a patient taking an MS DMD might be showing a sub-optimal response. We have applied the clinical scheme proposed by the Canadian TOR to the patients involved in the Prevention of Relapses and disability by Interferon Subcutaneously in MS 4-year (PRISMS-4) study, who received interferon beta-1a treatment for 4 years, with the TOR applied retrospectively at year 1.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to examine whether these TOR were able to predict which patients would go on to develop disease breakthrough (defined as any relapses or disease progression), indicative of a sub-optimal response over the ensuing 3 years of study and therefore might have benefited from a change in treatment.
RESULTS: We found 39% of patients receiving therapy experienced either a medium or high level of concern of breakthrough after a year of treatment, and 89% of these patients went on to develop further breakthrough over years 2-4. Although 67% of the 61% of patients having no or low-level concern after a year of treatment also experienced further disease breakthrough, it was significantly less than the medium or high group.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that the Canadian TOR may be an important tool for early treatment optimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18632774     DOI: 10.1177/1352458508093892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging in multiple sclerosis: neurotherapeutic implications.

Authors:  Nancy L Sicotte
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis: A clinical and MRI challenge.

Authors:  Claudio Gasperini; Luca Prosperini; Mar Tintoré; Maria Pia Sormani; Massimo Filippi; Jordi Rio; Jacqueline Palace; Maria A Rocca; Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Hugo Vrenken; Jette L Frederiksen; Tarek A Yousry; Christian Enzinger; Alex Rovira; Ludwig Kappos; Carlo Pozzilli; Xavier Montalban; Nicola De Stefano
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Induction vs. escalation of therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis: the evidence.

Authors:  Mark S Freedman
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Defining and scoring response to IFN-β in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Maria Pia Sormani; Nicola De Stefano
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 5.  Predicting responders to therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jordi Río; Manuel Comabella; Xavier Montalban
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  Risk-benefit considerations in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alessandra Lugaresi; Maria di Ioia; Daniela Travaglini; Erika Pietrolongo; Eugenio Pucci; Marco Onofrj
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.570

7.  Decision making under uncertainty, therapeutic inertia, and physicians' risk preferences in the management of multiple sclerosis (DIScUTIR MS).

Authors:  Gustavo Saposnik; Angel Perez Sempere; Roula Raptis; Daniel Prefasi; Daniel Selchen; Jorge Maurino
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  Study design of PANGAEA 2.0, a non-interventional study on RRMS patients to be switched to fingolimod.

Authors:  Tjalf Ziemssen; Raimar Kern; Christian Cornelissen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.474

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.