Literature DB >> 18632085

Aging preserves the ability to perceive 3D object shape from static but not deforming boundary contours.

J Farley Norman1, Ashley N Bartholomew, Cory L Burton.   

Abstract

A single experiment investigated how younger (aged 18-32 years) and older (aged 62-82 years) observers perceive 3D object shape from deforming and static boundary contours. On any given trial, observers were shown two smoothly-curved objects, similar to water-smoothed granite rocks, and were required to judge whether they possessed the "same" or "different" shape. The objects presented during the "different" trials produced differently-shaped boundary contours. The objects presented during the "same" trials also produced different boundary contours, because one of the objects was always rotated in depth relative to the other by 5, 25, or 45 degrees. Each observer participated in 12 experimental conditions formed by the combination of 2 motion types (deforming vs. static boundary contours), 2 surface types (objects depicted as silhouettes or with texture and Lambertian shading), and 3 angular offsets (5, 25, and 45 degrees). When there was no motion (static silhouettes or stationary objects presented with shading and texture), the older observers performed as well as the younger observers. In the moving object conditions with shading and texture, the older observers' performance was facilitated by the motion, but the amount of this facilitation was reduced relative to that exhibited by the younger observers. In contrast, the older observers obtained no benefit in performance at all from the deforming (i.e., moving) silhouettes. The reduced ability of older observers to perceive 3D shape from motion is probably due to a low-level deterioration in the ability to detect and discriminate motion itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18632085     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  7 in total

Review 1.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson's "feelies".

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Flip Phillips; Jessica S Holmin; Hideko F Norman; Amanda M Beers; Alexandria M Boswell; Jacob R Cheeseman; Angela G Stethen; Cecilia Ronning
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effects of aging on the perception of depth from motion parallax.

Authors:  Jessica Holmin; Mark Nawrot
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Aging and the haptic perception of 3D surface shape.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Astrid M L Kappers; Amanda M Beers; A Kate Scott; Hideko F Norman; Jan J Koenderink
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Perceiving Object Shape from Specular Highlight Deformation, Boundary Contour Deformation, and Active Haptic Manipulation.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Flip Phillips; Jacob R Cheeseman; Kelsey E Thomason; Cecilia Ronning; Kriti Behari; Kayla Kleinman; Autum B Calloway; Davora Lamirande
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Haptic shape discrimination and interhemispheric communication.

Authors:  Catherine J Dowell; J Farley Norman; Jackie R Moment; Lindsey M Shain; Hideko F Norman; Flip Phillips; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The life-span trajectory of visual perception of 3D objects.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.