BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to describe the long-term evolution of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a prospective cohort of patients under treatment with a close follow-up. METHODS: Six hundred eighty-six AD patients from the French Network on AD (REAL-FR) were followed up and assessed every 6 months for 2 years. Cognitive, functional, behavioral, nutritional, and global status were evaluated by using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), cognitive subscale of AD Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog), Activities of Daily Living scale (ADL), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). RESULTS: There were 85.13% of patients who were specifically treated for AD during their participation in the study. We observed significant changes (P < .0001) on MMSE, -4.57 +/- 0.23; ADAS-cog, 7.11 +/- 0.41; ADL, -1.32 +/- 0.07; NPI, 2.94 +/- 0.77; MNA, -0.81 +/- 0.17; and sum of boxes of the CDR (CDR-SB), 4.17 +/- 0.17. After 2 years, 10.79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.47 to 13.11) of the patients evolved twice as rapidly as the mean of the whole cohort on MMSE (loss, > or =9 points), 65.89% (95% CI, 62.34 to 69.44) reported a loss of 3 to 9 points, and 23.32% (95% CI, 20.16 to 26.46) were stable or improved (loss of -2 points maximum). Annual incidences for institutionalization, hospitalization, and death were 11.84% (95% CI, 9.76 to 13.92), 26.13% (95% CI, 22.52 to 29.74), and 5.95% (95% CI, 4.56 to 7.34), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a recent large AD cohort mostly under treatment, AD evolution appeared to be variable, with high incidences for death or institutionalization and with 11.84% of the patients exhibiting a rapid cognitive decline, whereas one fourth of the cohort appeared in relatively stable condition, and two thirds had a moderate but significant evolution of the disease. More studies are needed to better understand these variations in patients' evolution.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to describe the long-term evolution of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a prospective cohort of patients under treatment with a close follow-up. METHODS: Six hundred eighty-six ADpatients from the French Network on AD (REAL-FR) were followed up and assessed every 6 months for 2 years. Cognitive, functional, behavioral, nutritional, and global status were evaluated by using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), cognitive subscale of AD Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog), Activities of Daily Living scale (ADL), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). RESULTS: There were 85.13% of patients who were specifically treated for AD during their participation in the study. We observed significant changes (P < .0001) on MMSE, -4.57 +/- 0.23; ADAS-cog, 7.11 +/- 0.41; ADL, -1.32 +/- 0.07; NPI, 2.94 +/- 0.77; MNA, -0.81 +/- 0.17; and sum of boxes of the CDR (CDR-SB), 4.17 +/- 0.17. After 2 years, 10.79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.47 to 13.11) of the patients evolved twice as rapidly as the mean of the whole cohort on MMSE (loss, > or =9 points), 65.89% (95% CI, 62.34 to 69.44) reported a loss of 3 to 9 points, and 23.32% (95% CI, 20.16 to 26.46) were stable or improved (loss of -2 points maximum). Annual incidences for institutionalization, hospitalization, and death were 11.84% (95% CI, 9.76 to 13.92), 26.13% (95% CI, 22.52 to 29.74), and 5.95% (95% CI, 4.56 to 7.34), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a recent large AD cohort mostly under treatment, AD evolution appeared to be variable, with high incidences for death or institutionalization and with 11.84% of the patients exhibiting a rapid cognitive decline, whereas one fourth of the cohort appeared in relatively stable condition, and two thirds had a moderate but significant evolution of the disease. More studies are needed to better understand these variations in patients' evolution.
Authors: Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Sarah N Forrester; Christopher D Corcoran; Maria C Norton; Peter V Rabins; Martin I Steinberg; Joann T Tschanz; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Dingfen Han; Michelle M Mielke; Sarah N Forrester; JoAnn T Tschanz; Chris D Corcoran; Robert C Green; Maria C Norton; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Y Likitjaroen; T Meindl; U Friese; M Wagner; K Buerger; H Hampel; S J Teipel Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: JoAnn T Tschanz; Chris D Corcoran; Sarah Schwartz; Katherine Treiber; Robert C Green; Maria C Norton; Michelle M Mielke; Kathleen Piercy; Martin Steinberg; Peter V Rabins; Jeanne-Marie Leoutsakos; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; John C S Breitner; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Agustín Ruiz; Isabel Hernández; Maiteé Ronsende-Roca; Antonio González-Pérez; Emma Rodriguez-Noriega; Reposo Ramírez-Lorca; Ana Mauleón; Concha Moreno-Rey; Lucie Boswell; Larry Tune; Sergi Valero; Montserrat Alegret; Javier Gayán; James T Becker; Luis Miguel Real; Lluís Tárraga; Clive Ballard; Michael Terrin; Stephanie Sherman; Haydeh Payami; Oscar L López; Jacobo E Mintzer; Mercè Boada Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Eric Jutkowitz; Richard F MacLehose; Joseph E Gaugler; Bryan Dowd; Karen M Kuntz; Robert L Kane Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 6.053