Literature DB >> 18631886

The appendix as ureteral substitute: a report of 10 cases.

Haitham Dagash1, Sudipta Sen, Jacob Chacko, Sampath Karl, Dhruv Ghosh, Pulak Parag, A E Mackinnon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ureteric replacement in part or in total is rarely needed in children. We present our experience in using the appendix to replace the ureter.
METHODS: A retrospective case note review was carried out at Sheffield Children's Hospital (UK), Ekta Institute of Child Health (Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India) and Christian Medical College Hospital (Vellore, India) of all cases of ureteric substitution using the appendix.
RESULTS: Ten patients were identified, operated in 2002-2007: seven males and three females with a median age of 2.5 years (range 2.5 months to 12 years). The reasons for ureteric replacement were traumatic ureteric avulsion (n=1), congenital ureteric stenosis (n=5), non-drainage following previous pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (n=3) and ureteric stricture following reimplantation for vesico-ureteric reflux (n=1). The appendix was used in an anti-peristaltic manner in all cases, and in one case a transureteroureterostomy was performed. At a median follow up of 16months (1-72 months), all the patients were well except one whose kidney function had deteriorated.
CONCLUSIONS: Total or partial replacement of the ureter using the appendix, even in the first year of life, preserved renal function in nine cases. Ureteric continuity can be successfully restored in children using the appendix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18631886     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  16 in total

1.  [Use of bowel segments for ureter reconstruction].

Authors:  A Kocot; D C Vergho; H Riedmiller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  A review of ureteral injuries after external trauma.

Authors:  Bruno M T Pereira; Michael P Ogilvie; Juan Carlos Gomez-Rodriguez; Mark L Ryan; Diego Peña; Antonio C Marttos; Louis R Pizano; Mark G McKenney
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  How to manage total avulsion of the ureter from both ends: our experience and literature review.

Authors:  Ali Unsal; Ural Oguz; Altug Tuncel; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; Yilmaz Aslan; Asir Eraslan; Çagri Senocak; Ali Atan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  [Ureteral reconstruction after ureterorenoscopic injuries].

Authors:  A S Brandt; F-C von Rundstedt; D A Lazica; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Left ureteral appendiceal interposition: exercise caution and do not be mislead by postoperative radiological obstruction.

Authors:  Aderivaldo Cabral Dias Filho; Carlos Alberto Toledo Martinez; Maria Bianca Côrte; Marcus Vinicius Osorio Maroccolo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  [Avoidance and management of complications in open surgical ureter reconstruction].

Authors:  D A Lazica; A S Brandt; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Congenital ureteric stenosis: a study of 17 children.

Authors:  Lavanya Kannaiyan; Sampath Karl; John Mathai; Jacob Chacko; Sudipta Sen
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 8.  Ureteral reconstruction for complex strictures: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Alyssa Bilotta; Lucas R Wiegand; Kevin R Heinsimer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Absence of the appendix discovered during childhood.

Authors:  Michelle V Vincent; Alex Doyle; Sean Bernstein; Selma Jackman
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-09-12

10.  Use Of Appendix As Neoureter- A Ray Of Hope.

Authors:  Parveen Kumar; Yogesh Kumar Sarin
Journal:  J Neonatal Surg       Date:  2017-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.