Literature DB >> 18630928

Effects of metal nanoparticles on the secondary ion yields of a model alkane molecule upon atomic and polyatomic projectiles in secondary ion mass spectrometry.

Nimer Wehbe1, Andreas Heile, Heinrich F Arlinghaus, Patrick Bertrand, Arnaud Delcorte.   

Abstract

A model alkane molecule, triacontane, is used to assess the effects of condensed gold and silver nanoparticles on the molecular ion yields upon atomic (Ga(+) and In(+)) and polyatomic (C60(+) and Bi3(+)) ion bombardment in metal-assisted secondary ion mass spectrometry (MetA-SIMS). Molecular films spin-coated on silicon were metallized using a sputter-coater system, in order to deposit controlled quantities of gold and silver on the surface (from 0 to 15 nm equivalent thickness). The effects of gold and silver islets condensed on triacontane are also compared to the situation of thin triacontane overlayers on metallic substrates (gold and silver). The results focus primarily on the measured yields of quasi-molecular ions, such as (M - H)(+) and (2M - 2H)(+), and metal-cationized molecules, such as (M + Au)(+) and (M + Ag)(+), as a function of the quantity of metal on the surface. They confirm the absence of a simple rule to explain the secondary ion yield improvement in MetA-SIMS. The behavior is strongly dependent on the specific projectile/metal couple used for the experiment. Under atomic bombardment (Ga(+), In(+)), the characteristic ion yields an increase with the gold dose up to approximately 6 nm equivalent thickness. The yield enhancement factor between gold-metallized and pristine samples can be as large as approximately 70 (for (M - H)(+) under Ga(+) bombardment; 10 nm of Au). In contrast, with cluster projectiles such as Bi3(+) and C60(+), the presence of gold and silver leads to a dramatic molecular ion yield decrease. Cluster projectiles prove to be beneficial for triacontane overlayers spin-coated on silicon or metal substrates (Au, Ag) but not in the situation of MetA-SIMS. The fundamental difference of behavior between atomic and cluster primary ions is tentatively explained by arguments involving the different energy deposition mechanisms of these projectiles. Our results also show that Au and Ag nanoparticles do not induce the same behavior in MetA-SIMS of triacontane. The microstructures of the metallized layers are also different. While metallic substrates provide higher yields than metal islet overlayers in the case of silver, whatever the projectile used, the situation is reversed with gold.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18630928     DOI: 10.1021/ac800568y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  4 in total

1.  Biomolecular imaging with a C60-SIMS/MALDI dual ion source hybrid mass spectrometer: instrumentation, matrix enhancement, and single cell analysis.

Authors:  Eric J Lanni; Sage J B Dunham; Peter Nemes; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Influence of the organic layer thickness in (metal-assisted) secondary ion mass spectrometry using Ga+ and C60+ projectiles.

Authors:  Nimer Wehbe; Taoufiq Mouhib; Aneesh Prabhakaran; Patrick Bertrand; Arnaud Delcorte
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Metal-assisted polyatomic SIMS and laser desorption/ionization for enhanced small molecule imaging of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Sage J B Dunham; Troy J Comi; Kyungwon Ko; Bin Li; Nameera F Baig; Nydia Morales-Soto; Joshua D Shrout; Paul W Bohn; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 2.456

4.  Mass spectrometric imaging of brain tissue by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry--How do polyatomic primary beams C₆₀⁺, Ar₂₀₀₀⁺, water-doped Ar₂₀₀₀⁺ and (H₂O)₆₀₀₀⁺ compare?

Authors:  Irma Berrueta Razo; Sadia née Rabbani Sheraz; Alex Henderson; Nicholas P Lockyer; John C Vickerman
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.419

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.