Literature DB >> 18630484

Diminishing impact of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in prognosis of Dukes' C colorectal cancer.

Hiroshi Katoh1, Keishi Yamashita, Yukihito Kokuba, Takeo Satoh, Heita Ozawa, Kazuhiko Hatate, Atsushi Ihara, Takatoshi Nakamura, Wataru Onozato, Masahiko Watanabe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In curable colorectal cancer (CRC), preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (preCEA) has been reported to have predictive prognostic value. However, data remains insufficient to support its clinical use. The aim of the current study was to validate the prognostic impact of preCEA in Dukes' C CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prognostic significance of preCEA for 237 Dukes' C CRC patients assessed retrospectively (between 1990 and 2000: previous cases) and the prospective relevance for 197 counterparts (between 2001 and 2004: recent cases) according to preCEA, were both examined.
RESULTS: The previous cases showed the most potent impact of preCEA as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=2.0, p=0.003) among the clinicopathological factors using a multivariate proportional hazard model, while the recent cases did not even show a univariate prognostic impact. A significant difference in the prognosis between the two periods was only found in the patients with elevated preCEA administered adjuvant chemotherapy (ADT) (p=0.03). Between the two terms, a dramatic change of ADT regimens from 5FU alone (p<0.001) to 5FU in combination with leucovorin (p<0.001) and/or irinotecan (p-0.0009/0.005) was introduced, and N2 patient survival was dramatically improved. However, a significant prognostic difference for the elevated preCEA patients with ADT could not be demonstrated by sub-analysis of N1 and N2 disease due to diminished correlation of preCEA and the N factor (p=0.02 to 0.5), indicating that preCEA did not predict chemosensitivity.
CONCLUSION: The preCEA is no longer useful in predicting prognosis with Dukes' C CRC patients, because of the loss of preCEA association with the N factor, putatively through undefined diagnostic or therapeutic advancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18630484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  9 in total

1.  Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and prognosis of colorectal cancer. An independent prognostic factor still reliable.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Antonio Salvatore Rubino; Rosalia Latino; Fabio Giannone; Raffaele Lanteri; Beniamino Scilletta; Antonio Di Cataldo
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

2.  The serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen in drainage venous blood is not a sensitive predictor of metachronous hepatic metastasis for patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Masashi Haraguchi; Fumihiko Fujita; Yasuhiro Torashima; Takamitsu Inokuma; Yoshitsugu Tajima; Takashi Kanematsu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Prognostic value of preoperative D-dimer and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients undergoing intended curative resection for colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ehsan Motavaf; Kåre Gotschalck Sunesen; Mogens Tornby Stender; Ole Thorlacius-Ussing
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Prognostic value of plasmatic tumor M2 pyruvate kinase and carcinoembryonic antigen in the survival of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Daniel Fatela-Cantillo; Antonio Fernandez-Suarez; Miguel Alonso Marin Moreno; Juan Jesus Puente Gutierrez; Jose Miguel Diaz Iglesias
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-01-10

5.  Prognostic role of carcinoembryonic antigen is influenced by microsatellite instability genotype and stage in locally advanced colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Jon Arne Søreide; Hartwig Kørner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A New Nomogram for Predicting the Postoperative Overall Survival in Patients with Middle-Aged and Elderly Rectal Cancer: A Single Center Retrospective Study in Chinese Population.

Authors:  Honghong Zheng; Zhehong Li; Shuai Zheng; Jianjun Li; Ji Yang; Enhong Zhao
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-05-25

7.  Ribosomal protein S27-like in colorectal cancer: a candidate for predicting prognoses.

Authors:  Chi-Jung Huang; Shung-Haur Yang; Chia-Long Lee; Yu-Che Cheng; Szu-Yun Tai; Chih-Cheng Chien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Detection of methylated CDO1 in plasma of colorectal cancer; a PCR study.

Authors:  Keishi Yamashita; Mina Waraya; Myoung Sook Kim; David Sidransky; Natsuya Katada; Takeo Sato; Takatoshi Nakamura; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Proteomic Characterization of Colorectal Cancer Cells versus Normal-Derived Colon Mucosa Cells: Approaching Identification of Novel Diagnostic Protein Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Maja Ludvigsen; Louise Thorlacius-Ussing; Henrik Vorum; Mary Pat Moyer; Mogens Tornby Stender; Ole Thorlacius-Ussing; Bent Honoré
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.