Literature DB >> 18630197

Elaborative processing and conjunction errors in recognition memory.

Jason Arndt1, Todd C Jones.   

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted in order to examine the influence of elaborative processing at encoding on recognition memory conjunction lure errors. In these experiments, participants generated cues for compound words as wholes (e.g., haywire) or as separate entities (e.g., hay, wire). Studied words were re-presented in exact form (old) or recombined to form conjunction lures on the recognition test. Participants were asked to make old-new judgments and to indicate whether they had rejected items judged to be new because of recall of a studied item or because of lack of familiarity with an item. The results suggested that recall-to-reject processing and conjunction lure familiarity increased with both types of generation, although generation of cues for compound words as a whole did not influence conjunction lure error rates. An emphasis on processing each constituent of a compound word during encoding increased the familiarity of those constituents more than generation of a compound word as a whole, resulting in an increase in conjunction lure errors. These results suggest that both familiarity and recollection-based monitoring processes influence conjunction lure errors, and therefore support dual-process theories of recognition memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18630197     DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.5.899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

1.  Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning?

Authors:  D L Hintzman; T Curran; B Oppy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Recollection rejection: false-memory editing in children and adults.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; Ron Wright; A H Mojardin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Remember-know: a matter of confidence.

Authors:  John C Dunn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.

Authors:  James M Lampinen; Timothy N Odegard; Jeffrey S Neuschatz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Study repetition and the rejection of conjunction lures.

Authors:  Todd C Jones
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005-07

Review 6.  Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder; Jason Arndt; Heekyeong Park
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

7.  Feature and conjunction effects in recognition memory: toward specifying familiarity for compound words.

Authors:  Todd C Jones; Alan S Brown; Paul Atchley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

8.  On the utility of the signal detection model of the remember-know paradigm.

Authors:  E Hirshman
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-03

9.  Functional aspects of recollective experience.

Authors:  J M Gardiner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-07

10.  Dissociative effects of alcohol on recollective experience.

Authors:  H V Curran; M Hildebrandt
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1999-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?

Authors:  Phillip J Grimaldi; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  When false recognition is out of control: the case of facial conjunctions.

Authors:  Todd C Jones; James C Bartlett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

3.  Autobiographical memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Evidence for a role of inhibitory ability.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Lynette Tippett; Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-12

4.  Pre-stimulus neural activity predicts successful encoding of inter-item associations.

Authors:  Richard James Addante; Marianne de Chastelaine; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Conjunction errors and semantic transparency.

Authors:  Mungchen Wong; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.