Literature DB >> 18629222

Meta-analysis combines affymetrix microarray results across laboratories.

John R Stevens1, R W Doerge.   

Abstract

With microarray technology becoming more prevalent in recent years, it is now common for several laboratories to employ the same microarray technology to identify differentially expressed genes that are related to the same phenomenon in the same species. Although experimental specifics may be similar, each laboratory will typically produce a slightly different list of statistically significant genes, which calls into question the validity of each gene list (i.e. which list is best). A statistically-based meta-analytic approach to microarray analysis systematically combines results from the different laboratories to provide a single estimate of the degree of differential expression for each gene. This approach provides a more precise view of genes that are of significant interest, while simultaneously allowing for differences between laboratories. The widely-used Affymetrix oligonucleotide array and its software are of particular interest because the results are naturally suited to a meta-analysis. A simulation model based on the Affymetrix platform is developed to examine the adaptive nature of the meta-analytic approach and to illustrate the utility of such an approach in combining microarray results across laboratories.

Year:  2005        PMID: 18629222      PMCID: PMC2447518          DOI: 10.1002/cfg.460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics        ISSN: 1531-6912


  10 in total

1.  Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation.

Authors:  Jung Kyoon Choi; Ungsik Yu; Sangsoo Kim; Ook Joon Yoo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Statistical issues and methods for meta-analysis of microarray data: a case study in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh; Terrence R Barette; Dan Rhodes; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 3.410

3.  Meta-analysis of microarrays: interstudy validation of gene expression profiles reveals pathway dysregulation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel R Rhodes; Terrence R Barrette; Mark A Rubin; Debashis Ghosh; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Comparison and meta-analysis of microarray data: from the bench to the computer desk.

Authors:  Yves Moreau; Stein Aerts; Bart De Moor; Bart De Strooper; Michal Dabrowski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Large-scale meta-analysis of cancer microarray data identifies common transcriptional profiles of neoplastic transformation and progression.

Authors:  Daniel R Rhodes; Jianjun Yu; K Shanker; Nandan Deshpande; Radhika Varambally; Debashis Ghosh; Terrence Barrette; Akhilesh Pandey; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A cross-study comparison of gene expression studies for the molecular classification of lung cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Parmigiani; Elizabeth S Garrett-Mayer; Ramaswamy Anbazhagan; Edward Gabrielson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Differences in gene expression between B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and normal B cells: a meta-analysis of three microarray studies.

Authors:  J Wang; K R Coombes; W E Highsmith; M J Keating; L V Abruzzo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  affy--analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level.

Authors:  Laurent Gautier; Leslie Cope; Benjamin M Bolstad; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

Review 10.  Statistical tests for differential expression in cDNA microarray experiments.

Authors:  Xiangqin Cui; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 13.583

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Identification of cancer genomic markers via integrative sparse boosting.

Authors:  Yuan Huang; Jian Huang; Ben-Chang Shia; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Identification of Breast Cancer Prognosis Markers via Integrative Analysis.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Ying Dai; Jian Huang; Yang Xie
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  Integrative analysis and variable selection with multiple high-dimensional data sets.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang; Xiao Song
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Integrative analysis of multiple cancer prognosis studies with gene expression measurements.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang; Fengrong Wei; Yang Xie; Kuangnan Fang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Meta-analysis of glioblastoma multiforme versus anaplastic astrocytoma identifies robust gene markers.

Authors:  Jonathan M Dreyfuss; Mark D Johnson; Peter J Park
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 27.401

6.  Comparison study of microarray meta-analysis methods.

Authors:  Anna Campain; Yee Hwa Yang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Microarray meta-analysis identifies acute lung injury biomarkers in donor lungs that predict development of primary graft failure in recipients.

Authors:  Pingzhao Hu; Xinchen Wang; Jack J Haitsma; Suleiman Furmli; Hussain Masoom; Mingyao Liu; Yumiko Imai; Arthur S Slutsky; Joseph Beyene; Celia M T Greenwood; Claudia dos Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Consistent Differential Expression Pattern (CDEP) on microarray to identify genes related to metastatic behavior.

Authors:  Lam C Tsoi; Tingting Qin; Elizabeth H Slate; W Jim Zheng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Integrative prescreening in analysis of multiple cancer genomic studies.

Authors:  Rui Song; Jian Huang; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Meta-analysis derived (MAD) transcriptome of psoriasis defines the "core" pathogenesis of disease.

Authors:  Suyan Tian; James G Krueger; Katherine Li; Ali Jabbari; Carrie Brodmerkel; Michelle A Lowes; Mayte Suárez-Fariñas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.