Literature DB >> 18628694

Consciously postural sway and cervical vertigo after whiplash injury.

Kenji Endo1, Hidekazu Suzuki, Kengo Yamamoto.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of whiplash injury patients with vertigo and healthy volunteers consciously pretending to have postural sway as in malingering.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the postural sway in malingerers by posturography. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Malingering is not a problem in the majority of cases with whiplash injury and diagnosis should be made carefully. However, some patients with whiplash injury might exaggerate their symptoms or be malingerers because of the potential gain associated with insurance claims. We designed a diagnostic study to screen putative malingerers.
METHODS: Subjects were 20 healthy volunteers who were tested under standing condition (normal group), consciously swaying the body under standing condition like malingerers (pseudomalingering group) and 32 patients who complained of neck pain with vertigo or dizziness after whiplash injury with WAD (whiplash-associated disorders) grade I and II (WAD group). The movement of the center of pressure (COP) was measured using a force platform to quantify postural sway. Static posturography was performed under open and closed eyes. We analyzed (1) total envelop area per unit of time (EAREA), (2) shifting length per second (LNG/TIME), (3) sway pattern, and (4) Romberg rate representing total shifting length under eyes-closed/eyes-open.
RESULTS: In open eyes condition, the values of EAREA and LNG/TIME were significant higher under pseudomalingering than both of the control and WAD groups (P < 0.05). The Romberg rate was 1.30 +/- 0.17, 1.13 +/- 0.19, and 1.83 +/- 0.94 in control, pseudo-malingering, and WAD group, respectively, and was less than 1.0 in 45% of pseudomalingering. There were significant differences in the EAREA, LEN/TIME, and Romberg rate between pseudomalingering and the other 2 groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that compared with normal subjects and WAD patients, malingerers are more likely to exhibit a wide EAREA, a long sway length per second, and a low Romberg rate. Malingering must be diagnosed carefully and posturography could be a helpful supplementary tool for differentiating whiplash-associated vertigo from malingering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18628694     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c55fe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Aphysiologic performance on dynamic posturography in work-related patients.

Authors:  F Larrosa; M J Durà; J Menacho; L González-Sabaté; A Cordón; A Hernández; L García-Ibáñez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Approach to cervicogenic dizziness: a comprehensive review of its aetiopathology and management.

Authors:  K Devaraja
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Altered postural sway in patients suffering from non-specific neck pain and whiplash associated disorder - A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexander Ruhe; René Fejer; Bruce Walker
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2011-05-24

4.  Is there a relationship between pain intensity and postural sway in patients with non-specific low back pain?

Authors:  Alexander Ruhe; René Fejer; Bruce Walker
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Vestibular and stabilometric findings in whiplash injury and minor head trauma.

Authors:  A Nacci; M Ferrazzi; S Berrettini; E Panicucci; J Matteucci; L Bruschini; F Ursino; B Fattori
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Preoperative imaging differences of patients with cervical spondylosis with cervical vertigo indicate the prognosis after cervical total disc replacement.

Authors:  Shan Zheng; Aikeremujiang Muheremu; Yuqing Sun; Wei Tian; Cheng-Ai Wu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.671

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.