Literature DB >> 18628495

Cefoxitin disc diffusion test for detection of meticillin-resistant staphylococci.

Amita Jain1, Astha Agarwal1, Raj Kumar Verma1.   

Abstract

Staphylococci are the main causative agents of nosocomial diseases. Over the last few years, the increase in the number of meticillin-resistant (MR) staphylococci has become a major clinical problem. Accuracy and promptness in the detection of meticillin resistance are of key importance in ensuring the correct antibiotic treatment in infected patients and control of MR staphylococci in the hospital environment. This study evaluated the accuracy of a cefoxitin disc diffusion (DD) test for the detection of meticillin resistance in staphylococci. A total of 144 clinical isolates [97 Staphylococcus aureus and 47 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS)] were tested using a mecA gene PCR, a DD test (oxacillin, 1 mug disc; cefoxitin, 30 mug disc), determination of oxacillin MIC by agar dilution (AD), and an oxacillin screen agar test at oxacillin concentrations of 4 and 6 mug ml(-1). Of the 97 S. aureus and 47 CoNS isolates, 73 (75.26 %) and 30 (63.83 %), respectively, were mecA-positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the cefoxitin DD test were 94.44 and 95.83 %, respectively, for S. aureus and 80 and 100 %, respectively, for CoNS. The oxacillin DD method was 100 % sensitive and 58.33 % specific for S. aureus, and 86.67 % sensitive and 70.59 % specific for CoNS. The AD test was highly sensitive (98.63 %) and specific (98.53 %) for S. aureus and CoNS (83.33 % sensitive and 94.12 % specific). The cefoxitin DD test for meticillin-resistance detection was more specific but less sensitive than the oxacillin DD test. Use of DD tests for both cefoxitin and oxacillin can help in more accurate prediction of meticillin resistance. Centres that are not equipped to carry out PCR can use AD methods for confirmation of meticillin resistance, especially in oxacillin-resistant and cefoxitin-sensitive cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18628495     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47152-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  10 in total

1.  Accuracy of PCR universal primer for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus and comparison of different phenotypic screening assays.

Authors:  Dayanne A de Melo; Bianca da S Soares; Cássia C da Motta; Felipe C Dubenczuck; Nicolle L Barbieri; Catherine M Logue; Shana de O Coelho; Irene da S Coelho; Miliane M S de Souza
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Intravenous device associated blood stream staphylococcal infection in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Amita Jain; Astha Agarwal; Raj Kumar Verma; Shally Awasthi; K P Singh
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Usefulness of Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Simultaneous Pathogen Detection and Resistance Profiling of Staphylococcal Bacteremia.

Authors:  Yousun Chung; Taek Soo Kim; Young Gi Min; Yun Ji Hong; Jeong Su Park; Sang Mee Hwang; Kyoung-Ho Song; Eu Suk Kim; Kyoung Un Park; Hong Bin Kim; Junghan Song; Eui-Chong Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  High prevalence of MRSA and ESBL among asylum seekers in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Sofanne J Ravensbergen; Matthijs Berends; Ymkje Stienstra; Alewijn Ott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Anti-Bacterial and Anti-Fungal Activity of Xanthones Obtained via Semi-Synthetic Modification of α-Mangostin from Garcinia mangostana.

Authors:  Srinivasan Narasimhan; Shanmugam Maheshwaran; Imad A Abu-Yousef; Amin F Majdalawieh; Janarthanam Rethavathi; Prince Edwin Das; Palmiro Poltronieri
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Role of phenotypic testing in determining the mechanism of resistance in Gram-negative bacilli & risk factors for meropenem resistance.

Authors:  Kavita Raja; Molly Antony; Reeja Rani; Gracyamma Bridget
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Hospital Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Moshi, Tanzania, as Determined by Whole Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Happiness H Kumburu; Tolbert Sonda; Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon; Marco van Zwetselaar; Oksana Lukjancenko; Michael Alifrangis; Ole Lund; Blandina T Mmbaga; Gibson Kibiki; Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Patients with Rheumatic Diseases do not have an Increased Risk of MRSA Carrier Status.

Authors:  Judith Krämer; Konstantinos Triantafyllias; Wolfgang Kohnen; Martin Leber; Ute Dederichs-Masius; Andrea Zucker; Jürgen Körber; Andreas Schwarting
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2018-06-02

9.  Screening of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci in the nasal cavity of patients and healthy individuals.

Authors:  Naiyf S Alharbi
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Staphylococcus aureus in Milk and Traditionally Processed Dairy Products in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Fikirte Lemma; Haile Alemayehu; Andrew Stringer; Tadesse Eguale
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.