Literature DB >> 18628288

The wisdom of the commons: ensemble tree classifiers for prostate cancer prognosis.

James A Koziol1, Anne C Feng, Zhenyu Jia, Yipeng Wang, Seven Goodison, Michael McClelland, Dan Mercola.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Classification and regression trees have long been used for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Nevertheless, instability and variable selection bias, as well as overfitting, are well-known problems of tree-based methods. In this article, we investigate whether ensemble tree classifiers can ameliorate these difficulties, using data from two recent studies of radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer.
RESULTS: Using time to progression following prostatectomy as the relevant clinical endpoint, we found that ensemble tree classifiers robustly and reproducibly identified three subgroups of patients in the two clinical datasets: non-progressors, early progressors and late progressors. Moreover, the consensus classifications were independent predictors of time to progression compared to known clinical prognostic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18628288      PMCID: PMC2638928          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  20 in total

1.  A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data.

Authors:  G J McLachlan; R W Bean; D Peel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification.

Authors:  Richard Simon; Michael D Radmacher; Kevin Dobbin; Lisa M McShane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set?

Authors:  Liat Ein-Dor; Itai Kela; Gad Getz; David Givol; Eytan Domany
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Relative risk trees for censored survival data.

Authors:  M LeBlanc; J Crowley
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Tree-structured survival analysis.

Authors:  L Gordon; R A Olshen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-10

6.  Statistical approach to immunosuppression classification using lymphocyte surface markers and functional assays.

Authors:  R O Dillman; J A Koziol
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Gene expression alterations in prostate cancer predicting tumor aggression and preceding development of malignancy.

Authors:  Yan Ping Yu; Douglas Landsittel; Ling Jing; Joel Nelson; Baoguo Ren; Lijun Liu; Courtney McDonald; Ryan Thomas; Rajiv Dhir; Sydney Finkelstein; George Michalopoulos; Michael Becich; Jian-Hua Luo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  In silico dissection of cell-type-associated patterns of gene expression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robert O Stuart; William Wachsman; Charles C Berry; Jessica Wang-Rodriguez; Linda Wasserman; Igor Klacansky; Dan Masys; Karen Arden; Steven Goodison; Michael McClelland; Yipeng Wang; Anne Sawyers; Iveta Kalcheva; David Tarin; Dan Mercola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Recursive partitioning as an approach to selection of immune markers for tumor diagnosis.

Authors:  James A Koziol; Jian-Ying Zhang; Carlos A Casiano; Xuan-Xian Peng; Fu-Dong Shi; Anne C Feng; Edward K L Chan; Eng M Tan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  6 in total

1.  A sample selection strategy to boost the statistical power of signature detection in cancer expression profile studies.

Authors:  Zhenyu Jia; Yipeng Wang; Yuanjie Hu; Christine McLaren; Yingyan Yu; Kai Ye; Xiao-Qin Xia; James A Koziol; Waldemar Lernhardt; Michael McClelland; Dan Mercola
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 2.  Derivation of cancer diagnostic and prognostic signatures from gene expression data.

Authors:  Steve Goodison; Yijun Sun; Virginia Urquidi
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  The rank product method with two samples.

Authors:  James A Koziol
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  In silico estimates of tissue components in surgical samples based on expression profiling data.

Authors:  Yipeng Wang; Xiao-Qin Xia; Zhenyu Jia; Anne Sawyers; Huazhen Yao; Jessica Wang-Rodriquez; Dan Mercola; Michael McClelland
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Functional and topological properties in hepatocellular carcinoma transcriptome.

Authors:  Ignat Drozdov; Jan Bornschein; Thomas Wex; Najl V Valeyev; Sophia Tsoka; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Feature selection through validation and un-censoring of endovascular repair survival data for predicting the risk of re-intervention.

Authors:  Omneya Attallah; Alan Karthikesalingam; Peter J E Holt; Matthew M Thompson; Rob Sayers; Matthew J Bown; Eddie C Choke; Xianghong Ma
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.796

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.