BACKGROUND: Most recommended care for chronic diseases is based on the research of single conditions. There is limited information on 'best' processes of care for persons with multiple morbidities. Our objective was to explore processes of care desired by elderly patients who have multimorbidities that may present competing demands for patients and providers. METHODS: Qualitative investigation using one-on-one interviews of 26 community-dwelling HMO members aged 65-84 (50% male) who had, at a minimum, the combined conditions of diabetes, depression and osteoarthritis. Participants were chosen from a stratified random sample to have a range of 4-16 chronic medical conditions. RESULTS: Participants' desired processes of care included: the need for convenient access to providers (telephone, internet or in person), clear communication of individualized care plans, support from a single coordinator of care who could help prioritize their competing demands and continuity of relationships. They also desired providers who would listen to and acknowledge their needs, appreciate that these' needs were unique and fluctuating and have a caring attitude. CONCLUSIONS: These respondents describe an ideal process of care that is patient centered and individualized and that supports their unique constellations of problems, shifting priorities and multidimensional decision making. Individual and ongoing care coordination managed by a primary contact person may meet some of these needs. Achieving these goals will require developing efficient methods of assessing patient care needs and flexible care management support systems that can respond to patients' needs for different levels of support at different times.
BACKGROUND: Most recommended care for chronic diseases is based on the research of single conditions. There is limited information on 'best' processes of care for persons with multiple morbidities. Our objective was to explore processes of care desired by elderly patients who have multimorbidities that may present competing demands for patients and providers. METHODS: Qualitative investigation using one-on-one interviews of 26 community-dwelling HMO members aged 65-84 (50% male) who had, at a minimum, the combined conditions of diabetes, depression and osteoarthritis. Participants were chosen from a stratified random sample to have a range of 4-16 chronic medical conditions. RESULTS:Participants' desired processes of care included: the need for convenient access to providers (telephone, internet or in person), clear communication of individualized care plans, support from a single coordinator of care who could help prioritize their competing demands and continuity of relationships. They also desired providers who would listen to and acknowledge their needs, appreciate that these' needs were unique and fluctuating and have a caring attitude. CONCLUSIONS: These respondents describe an ideal process of care that is patient centered and individualized and that supports their unique constellations of problems, shifting priorities and multidimensional decision making. Individual and ongoing care coordination managed by a primary contact person may meet some of these needs. Achieving these goals will require developing efficient methods of assessing patient care needs and flexible care management support systems that can respond to patients' needs for different levels of support at different times.
Authors: Christopher J Stille; Anthony Jerant; Douglas Bell; David Meltzer; Joann G Elmore Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-04-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: John W Beasley; Terry H Hankey; Rodney Erickson; Kurt C Stange; Marlon Mundt; Marguerite Elliott; Pamela Wiesen; James Bobula Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: F G Schellevis; E H Van de Lisdonk; J Van der Velden; S H Hoogbergen; J T Van Eijk; C Van Weel Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 1994-06 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Elizabeth A Bayliss; John F Steiner; Douglas H Fernald; Lori A Crane; Deborah S Main Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Barbara Starfield; Klaus W Lemke; Terence Bernhardt; Steven S Foldes; Christopher B Forrest; Jonathan P Weiner Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Siran M Koroukian; Nicholas Schiltz; David F Warner; Jiayang Sun; Paul M Bakaki; Kathleen A Smyth; Kurt C Stange; Charles W Given Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jose M Valderas; Barbara Starfield; Bonnie Sibbald; Chris Salisbury; Martin Roland Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Joanne Protheroe; Tom Blakeman; Peter Bower; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Anne Kennedy Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Stefanie Mache; Karin Vitzthum; Albert Nienhaus; Burghard F Klapp; David A Groneberg Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-08-13 Impact factor: 2.655