Literature DB >> 18627824

Fine structural correlates of sensitivity in the eyes of the ctenid spider, Cupiennius salei Keys.

M Grusch1, F G Barth, E Eguchi.   

Abstract

We studied fine structural correlates of sensitivity in the principal and secondary eyes of the nocturnal hunting spider Cupiennius salei. In night-adapted eyes the four rhabdomeres of the principal eye photoreceptors are 58 microm long and occupy together 234 microm(2) in cross-section (average), whereas the two rhabdomeres of the secondary eye photoreceptors are about 49 microm long and measure 135-183 microm(2) in cross-section (average). The rhabdoms (photosensitive structures) consist of tightly packed microvilli (diameter 0.1 microm, maximum length 3.5 microm) and occupy up to 63% of the cross-sectional area of the retina. When calculating the amount of light the eyes of Cupiennius are able to capture according to their morphological characteristics, the values for sensitivity S(see Land, 1981, 1985) are between 78 and 109 microm(2). Cupiennius is more sensitive than any other hunting spider examined except Dinopis whose posterior median eyes are the most sensitive ones of all terrestrial arthropod eyes studied. In day-adapted eyes the rhabdomeral microvilli are almost completely degraded. The remaining microvillar surface amounts to only about one-tenth compared with the night-adapted state. Efferent synaptoid terminals have been found to contact the photoreceptors in all eyes of C. salei. The present fine structural data are compared to previous electrophysiological research and underline the significance of vision in Cupiennius.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 18627824     DOI: 10.1016/s0040-8166(97)80028-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Cell        ISSN: 0040-8166            Impact factor:   2.466


  8 in total

Review 1.  Evolution and development of complex eyes: a celebration of diversity.

Authors:  Kristen M Koenig; Jeffrey M Gross
Journal:  Development       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 2.  Homing in the arachnid taxa Araneae and Amblypygi.

Authors:  Joaquín Ortega-Escobar
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Opsins in Limulus eyes: characterization of three visible light-sensitive opsins unique to and co-expressed in median eye photoreceptors and a peropsin/RGR that is expressed in all eyes.

Authors:  Barbara-Anne Battelle; Karen E Kempler; Spencer R Saraf; Catherine E Marten; Donald R Dugger; Daniel I Speiser; Todd H Oakley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Adaptations for vision in dim light: impulse responses and bumps in nocturnal spider photoreceptor cells (Cupiennius salei Keys).

Authors:  Karin Pirhofer-Walzl; Eric Warrant; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Spatial acuity-sensitivity trade-off in the principal eyes of a jumping spider: possible adaptations to a 'blended' lifestyle.

Authors:  Ana M Cerveira; Ximena J Nelson; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Spectral sensitivity of the ctenid spider Cupiennius salei.

Authors:  Lydia M Zopf; Axel Schmid; David Fredman; Bo Joakim Eriksson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Characterisation and localisation of the opsin protein repertoire in the brain and retinas of a spider and an onychophoran.

Authors:  Bo Joakim Eriksson; David Fredman; Gerhard Steiner; Axel Schmid
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Opsin Repertoire and Expression Patterns in Horseshoe Crabs: Evidence from the Genome of Limulus polyphemus (Arthropoda: Chelicerata).

Authors:  Barbara-Anne Battelle; Joseph F Ryan; Karen E Kempler; Spencer R Saraf; Catherine E Marten; Wesley C Warren; Patrick J Minx; Michael J Montague; Pamela J Green; Skye A Schmidt; Lucinda Fulton; Nipam H Patel; Meredith E Protas; Richard K Wilson; Megan L Porter
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.416

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.