Literature DB >> 18627496

Systemic induced resistance: a risk-spreading strategy in clonal plant networks?

Sara Gómez1,2, Yusuke Onoda3, Vladimir Ossipov4, Josef F Stuefer1.   

Abstract

Clonal plant networks consist of interconnected individuals (ramets) of different sizes and ages. They represent heterogeneous ramet assemblages with marked differences in quality and attractiveness for herbivores. Here, feeding preferences of a generalist herbivore (Spodoptera exigua) for differently-aged ramets of Trifolium repens were studied, and changes in herbivore preference in response to systemic defense induction were investigated. Dual-choice tests were used to assess the preference of herbivores for young versus mature ramets of induced and uninduced plants, respectively. Additionally, leaf traits related to nutrition, biomechanics and chemical defense were measured to explain variation in tissue quality and herbivore preference. Young ramets were heavily damaged in control plants. After systemic defense induction, damage on young ramets was greatly reduced, while damage on mature ramets increased slightly. Defense induction increased leaf strength and thickness, decreased leaf soluble carbohydrates and substantially changed phenolic composition of undamaged ramets connected to attacked individuals. Systemic induced resistance led to a more dispersed feeding pattern among ramets of different ages. It is proposed that inducible defense acts as a risk-spreading strategy in clonal plants by equalizing herbivore preference within the clone, thereby avoiding extended selective feeding on valuable plant tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18627496     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02542.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  9 in total

1.  Partial mechanical stimulation facilitates the growth of the rhizomatous plant Leymus secalinus: modulation by clonal integration.

Authors:  Yuan Sui; Weiming He; Xu Pan; Ming Dong
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Clonal Saplings of Trembling Aspen Do Not Coordinate Defense Induction.

Authors:  Olivia L Cope; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Phytophagous arthropods and a pathogen sharing a host plant: evidence for indirect plant-mediated interactions.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Mouttet; Philippe Bearez; Cécile Thomas; Nicolas Desneux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Rumor has it...: relay communication of stress cues in plants.

Authors:  Omer Falik; Yonat Mordoch; Lydia Quansah; Aaron Fait; Ariel Novoplansky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Grazing influences Stipa breviflora seed germination in desert grasslands of the Inner Mongolia Plateau.

Authors:  Wenting Liu; Tianle Wang; Shuang Zhang; Lijun Ding; Zhijun Wei
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Ultraviolet B Radiation Triggers DNA Methylation Change and Affects Foraging Behavior of the Clonal Plant Glechoma longituba.

Authors:  Jiaxin Quan; Vít Latzel; Dan Tie; Yuhan Zhang; Zuzana Münzbergová; Yongfu Chai; Xiao Liu; Ming Yue
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Physiological integration ameliorates negative effects of drought stress in the clonal herb Fragaria orientalis.

Authors:  Yunchun Zhang; Qiaoying Zhang; Marek Sammul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clonal plasticity and diversity facilitates the adaptation of Rhododendron aureum Georgi to alpine environment.

Authors:  Xiaolong Wang; Wei Zhao; Lin Li; Jian You; Biao Ni; Xia Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Clonal versus non-clonal milkweeds (Asclepias spp.) respond differently to stem damage, affecting oviposition by monarch butterflies.

Authors:  Elise He; Anurag A Agrawal
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.