Literature DB >> 18626723

The closure of a medical practice forces older patients to make difficult decisions: a qualitative study of a natural experiment.

Mary Anne J Nidiry1, Aysegul Gozu, Joseph A Carrese, Scott M Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The closure of a primary care practice and the relocation of the physicians and staff to a new office forced patients to decide whether to follow their primary care physicians (PCP) or to transfer their care elsewhere. This study explores the perspectives of the older patients affected by this change.
DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Two lists of patients older than 60 years from the original office were generated: (1) those who had followed their PCPs to the further practice and (2) those who chose new PCPs at an affiliated nearby clinic. One hundred forty patients from each of the two lists were randomly selected for study. MEASUREMENT: Eight months after the clinic's closure, patients responded to an open-ended question asking patients to describe the transition. Using content analysis, two investigators independently coded all of the written responses.
RESULTS: Over 85% of patients in both groups had been with their original PCP for longer than 2 years. Patients that elected to transition their care to a new PCP within their community were older (75 vs 70 years) and more likely to be living alone (38% vs 18%), both p < 0.01. There was still considerable frustration associated with the clinic's closure. Patients from both groups had variable levels of satisfaction with their new primary care arrangements. Patients who moved to the near clinic, now seeing a new physician, commented on being satisfied with the proximity of the site. On the other hand, these patients also expressed longing for the previous arrangement (the building, the staff, and especially their prior physician). Patients who transferred their care to the further clinic indicated a profound loyalty to their PCP and an appreciation of the added features at the new site. Yet, many patients still described being upset with the difficulties associated with the further distance.
CONCLUSION: The closing of this practice was difficult for this cohort of older patients. Patients' decisions were considerably influenced by whether they imagined that convenience or their established relationship with their PCP was of a higher priority to them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626723      PMCID: PMC2533390          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0718-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  18 in total

1.  Benefits of and barriers to large medical group practice in the United States.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; Kelly J Devers; Timothy K Lake; Marie Reed; Jeffrey J Stoddard
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-09-08

2.  Unhealthy trends: the future of physician services.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Paul B Ginsburg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Switching doctors: predictors of voluntary disenrollment from a primary physician's practice.

Authors:  D G Safran; J E Montgomery; H Chang; J Murphy; W H Rogers
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Patient attitudes toward continuity of care.

Authors:  Anne G Pereira; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-28

5.  Changes in alcohol consumption following a reduction in the price of spirits: a natural experiment in Switzerland.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Heeb; Gerhard Gmel; Christoph Zurbrügg; Meichun Kuo; Jürgen Rehm
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Relationships between poverty and psychopathology: a natural experiment.

Authors:  E Jane Costello; Scott N Compton; Gordon Keeler; Adrian Angold
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Leaving the practice: effects of primary care physician departure on patient care.

Authors:  Anne G Pereira; Ken P Kleinman; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003 Dec 8-22

Review 8.  Defining the future of primary care: what can we learn from patients?.

Authors:  Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Vulnerability and the patient-practitioner relationship: the roles of gatekeeping and primary care performance.

Authors:  Leiyu Shi; Christopher B Forrest; Sarah Von Schrader; Judy Ng
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The patient-physician relationship, primary care attributes, and preventive services.

Authors:  Michael L Parchman; Sandra K Burge
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.