AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: People of African origin have increased risk of stroke and retinal microvascular disease compared with populations of European origin. We compared quantitative measures of retinal microvasculature in British white Europeans and African Caribbeans. METHODS: Population-based study of 215 (45% male) British African-Caribbean migrants and 323 (48% male) white Europeans aged 40-69 years. Digitised retinal images were analysed using a validated semi-automated system. RESULTS: Arteriolar optimality deviation, an indicator of endothelial dysfunction, was greater in African Caribbeans (age- and sex-adjusted means [95% CIs]: 0.06 [0.05-0.06] vs 0.04 [0.04-0.05], p = 0.004); this was unexplained by conventional risk factors. Arteriolar diameters were narrower in African Caribbeans (age- and sex-adjusted means [95% CIs]: 18.4 [18.1-18.6] vs 17.9 [17.6-18.2], p = 0.011). These ethnic differences in diameters were attenuated on adjustment for systolic BP (SBP) (adjusted means: 18.2 vs 18.1, p = 0.31). However, there was a significant interaction (p = 0.011) between diabetes and SBP, such that SBP was strongly associated with arteriolar diameter in people without diabetes, but not in those with diabetes (adjusted beta-coefficients for SBP: Europeans: -0.42, p = 0.002 vs 0.17, p = 0.69, African Caribbeans: -0.35, p = 0.023 vs 0.01, p = 0.96). Other measures of retinal vasculature did not differ by ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: British African Caribbeans appear to have poorer retinal arteriolar endothelial function than white Europeans. Higher BPs explained the narrower arterioles in African Caribbeans; however, patterns of association between arteriolar narrowing and BP suggest the possibility that cerebral autoregulation and/or remodelling might be adversely affected by diabetes in both ethnic groups.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: People of African origin have increased risk of stroke and retinal microvascular disease compared with populations of European origin. We compared quantitative measures of retinal microvasculature in British white Europeans and African Caribbeans. METHODS: Population-based study of 215 (45% male) British African-Caribbean migrants and 323 (48% male) white Europeans aged 40-69 years. Digitised retinal images were analysed using a validated semi-automated system. RESULTS: Arteriolar optimality deviation, an indicator of endothelial dysfunction, was greater in African Caribbeans (age- and sex-adjusted means [95% CIs]: 0.06 [0.05-0.06] vs 0.04 [0.04-0.05], p = 0.004); this was unexplained by conventional risk factors. Arteriolar diameters were narrower in African Caribbeans (age- and sex-adjusted means [95% CIs]: 18.4 [18.1-18.6] vs 17.9 [17.6-18.2], p = 0.011). These ethnic differences in diameters were attenuated on adjustment for systolic BP (SBP) (adjusted means: 18.2 vs 18.1, p = 0.31). However, there was a significant interaction (p = 0.011) between diabetes and SBP, such that SBP was strongly associated with arteriolar diameter in people without diabetes, but not in those with diabetes (adjusted beta-coefficients for SBP: Europeans: -0.42, p = 0.002 vs 0.17, p = 0.69, African Caribbeans: -0.35, p = 0.023 vs 0.01, p = 0.96). Other measures of retinal vasculature did not differ by ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: British African Caribbeans appear to have poorer retinal arteriolar endothelial function than white Europeans. Higher BPs explained the narrower arterioles in African Caribbeans; however, patterns of association between arteriolar narrowing and BP suggest the possibility that cerebral autoregulation and/or remodelling might be adversely affected by diabetes in both ethnic groups.
Authors: Nicholas Witt; Tien Y Wong; Alun D Hughes; Nish Chaturvedi; Barbara E Klein; Richard Evans; Mary McNamara; Simon A McG Thom; Ronald Klein Journal: Hypertension Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: T Y Wong; L D Hubbard; R Klein; E K Marino; R Kronmal; A R Sharrett; D S Siscovick; G Burke; J M Tielsch Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Tien Yin Wong; Ronald Klein; Bruce B Duncan; F Javier Nieto; Barbara E K Klein; David J Couper; Larry D Hubbard; A Richey Sharrett Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-03-24 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Halina White; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Cuiling Wang; Mitchell S V Elkind; Tanja Rundek; Clinton B Wright; Ralph L Sacco Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kevin McGeechan; Gerald Liew; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; Johannes R Vingerling; Paulus T V M de Jong; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Monique M B Breteler; Jonathan Shaw; Paul Zimmet; Tien Y Wong Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Alun D Hughes; Raj Bathula; Chloe Park; Therese Tillin; Nicholas Wit; Simon McG Thom; Nish Chaturvedi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: George Michael Saleh; James Wawrzynski; Silvestro Caputo; Tunde Peto; Lutfiah Ismail Al Turk; Su Wang; Yin Hu; Lyndon Da Cruz; Phil Smith; Hongying Lilian Tang Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Kevin McGeechan; Gerald Liew; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; Johannes R Vingerling; Paulus T V M Dejong; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Monique M B Breteler; Jonathan Shaw; Paul Zimmet; Tien Y Wong Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Therese Tillin; Alun D Hughes; Jamil Mayet; Peter Whincup; Naveed Sattar; Nita G Forouhi; Paul M McKeigue; Nish Chaturvedi Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Dries S Martens; Fang-Fei Wei; Bianca Cox; Michelle Plusquin; Lutgarde Thijs; Ellen Winckelmans; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Tim S Nawrot; Jan A Staessen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 4.379