Literature DB >> 18626608

Noninvasive cell tracking.

Fabian Kiessling1.   

Abstract

Cell-based therapies may gain future importance in defeating different kinds of diseases, including cancer, immunological disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiac infarction and stroke. In this context, the noninvasive localization of the transplanted cells and the monitoring of their migration can facilitate basic research on the underlying mechanism and improve clinical translation. In this chapter, different ways to label and track cells in vivo are described. The oldest and only clinically established method is leukocyte scintigraphy, which enables a (semi)quantitative assessment of cell assemblies and, thus, the localization of inflammation foci. Noninvasive imaging of fewer or even single cells succeeds with MRI after labeling of the cells with (ultrasmall) superparamagentic iron oxide particles (SPIO and USPIO). However, in order to gain an acceptable signal-to-noise ratio, at a sufficiently high spatial resolution of the MR sequence to visualize a small amount of cells, experimental MR scanners working at high magnetic fields are usually required. Nevertheless, feasibility of clinical translation has been achieved by showing the localization of USPIO-labeled dendritic cells in cervical lymph nodes of patients by clinical MRI.Cell-tracking approaches using optical methods are important for preclinical research. Here, cells are labeled either with fluorescent dyes or quantum dots, or transfected with plasmids coding for fluorescent proteins such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) or red fluorescent protein (RFP). The advantage of the latter approach is that the label does not get lost during cell division and, thus, makes imaging of proliferating transplanted cells (e.g., tumor cells) possible. In summary, there are several promising options for noninvasive cell tracking, which have different strengths and limitations that should be considered when planning cell-tracking experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626608     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77496-9_13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol        ISSN: 0171-2004


  9 in total

1.  Advancing molecular imaging: a chairman's perspective on how radiology can meet the challenge.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-08-31

2.  A new nano-sized iron oxide particle with high sensitivity for cellular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chih-Lung Chen; Haosen Zhang; Qing Ye; Wen-Yuan Hsieh; T Kevin Hitchens; Hsin-Hsin Shen; Li Liu; Yi-Jen Wu; Lesley M Foley; Shian-Jy Wang; Chien Ho
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  The evolution of imaging in cancer: current state and future challenges.

Authors:  Luke J Higgins; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Clinical applications in molecular imaging.

Authors:  Carola Heneweer; Jan Grimm
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03

Review 5.  Whole animal imaging.

Authors:  Gurpreet Singh Sandhu; Luis Solorio; Ann-Marie Broome; Nicolas Salem; Jeff Kolthammer; Tejas Shah; Chris Flask; Jeffrey L Duerk
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

6.  Comparison of cell-labeling methods with ¹²⁴I-FIAU and ⁶⁴Cu-PTSM for cell tracking using chronic myelogenous leukemia cells expressing HSV1-tk and firefly luciferase.

Authors:  Jae-Jun Park; Tae-Sup Lee; Jin-Ju Son; Kwon-Soo Chun; In-Ho Song; Yong-Serk Park; Kwang-Il Kim; Yong-Jin Lee; Joo-Hyun Kang
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.099

7.  Labeling of stem cells with monocrystalline iron oxide for tracking and localization by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sergio Li Calzi; David L Kent; Kyung-Hee Chang; Kyle R Padgett; Aqeela Afzal; Saurav B Chandra; Sergio Caballero; Denis English; Wendy Garlington; Paul S Hiscott; Carl M Sheridan; Maria B Grant; John R Forder
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.514

Review 8.  Cell tracking in cardiac repair: what to image and how to image.

Authors:  Alessandro Ruggiero; Daniel L J Thorek; Jamal Guenoun; Gabriel P Krestin; Monique R Bernsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  99m-Technetium binding site in bone marrow mononuclear cells.

Authors:  Grazielle Dias Suhett; Sergio Augusto Lopes de Souza; Adriana Bastos Carvalho; Rachel de Pinho Rachid; Narcisa Leal da Cunha-E-Silva; Antonio Carlos Campos de Carvalho; Lea Mirian Barbosa da Fonseca; Regina Coeli dos Santos Goldenberg; Bianca Gutfilen
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 6.832

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.