Literature DB >> 18626379

Brachioplasty and concomitant procedures after massive weight loss: a statistical analysis from a prospective registry.

Jeffrey A Gusenoff1, Devin Coon, J Peter Rubin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A growing number of massive weight loss patients are undergoing brachioplasty. The authors analyzed data from a prospective registry of massive weight loss patients who underwent brachioplasty alone or with concomitant operations to identify statistically significant complications.
METHODS: One hundred one massive weight loss patients underwent brachioplasty. Outcome measures included operative time; time since gastric bypass; need for revision; arm liposuction; and complications such as seroma, dehiscence, hematoma, infection, and nerve injury. Univariate analyses were performed to assess outcome measures.
RESULTS: One hundred one patients (97 women and four men; mean age, 45.9 +/- 10.1 years; mean body mass index, 29 +/- 3.9) with a mean time since gastric bypass of 28.5 months (range, 7 to 252 months) underwent brachioplasty. Ninety-seven patients (96 percent) had concomitant body contouring procedures; 23.8 percent had concomitant arm liposuction; and 36 patients had complications related to their arms, mostly in the form of a seroma, whereas dehiscence, infection, and hematoma were more prevalent with the concomitant procedures. Patients with a greater change in body mass index had a higher chance of wound infection (odds ratio, 1.1; p = 0.028). Longer operative time was associated with increased rates of surgical complications (p = 0.003; odds ratio, 3.8) at the operative site. There was a trend toward increased complications when arm liposuction was combined with brachioplasty (odds ratio, 2.5; p = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Brachioplasty is a safe and effective method of treating upper arm deformity in the massive weight loss patient. Although patients with greater weight loss are likely to present for longer contouring procedures and are at highest risk for wound-healing complications, these complications occur most frequently in areas other than the arms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626379     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d54a9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Complications in body contouring stratified according to weight loss method.

Authors:  Matthew D Chetta; Oluseyi Aliu; Bao Anh Patrick Tran; Mariam Abdulghani; Kelly M Kidwell; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Upper arm contouring with brachioplasty after massive weight loss.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Han; Min Cheol Lee; Sang Hwa Kim; Jung Ho Lee; Sang Tae Ahn; Jong Won Rhie
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-05-12

3.  Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma Glue in Weight Loss Sequelae Surgery and Breast Reduction: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Barbara Hersant; Mounia SidAhmed-Mezi; Simone La Padula; Jeremy Niddam; Jonathan Bouhassira; Jean Paul Meningaud
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-11-15

4.  Arm Contouring After Massive Weight Loss: Liposuction-Assisted Brachioplasty Versus Standard Technique.

Authors:  Verdiana Di Pietro; Gianfranco M Colicchia; Valerio Cervelli; Pietro Gentile
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Avoidance and Correction of Deformities in Body Contouring.

Authors:  Andrew M Ferry; Edward Chamata; Rami P Dibbs; Norman H Rappaport
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.