Literature DB >> 18626352

Breast reduction: safe in the morbidly obese?

Kendall Roehl1, E Stirling Craig, Victoria Gómez, Linda G Phillips.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With an increasing obese population, plastic surgeons are consulted by women requesting larger breast reductions, with body mass indices in the obese to morbidly obese range (30 to >or=40 kg/m) and breasts considered gigantomastic (>2000 g resected from each breast). There have been few descriptions of outcomes in the morbidly obese population. Previous literature reports high complication rates in obese women and large-volume breast reductions.
METHODS: Retrospective investigation of 179 reduction mammaplasty patients was performed out to determine whether reduction mass, age, body mass index, smoking, method used (i.e., vertical pedicle, inferior pedicle/central mound, or free nipple graft), and comorbidities influenced complication rates. The patients were categorized by size of reduction, age, and body mass index.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 50 percent. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of complications attributable to size of reduction, age, or body mass index (p = 0.37, p = 0.13, and p = 0.38, respectively). Also, smoking status, method used (p = 0.65 and p = 0.17, and p = 0.48 and p = 0.1, respectively) and comorbidities had no effect on complication rates (reduction size, p = 0.054; age, p = 0.12; and body mass index, p = 0.072). There was no significant increase in the rate of complications for each body mass index group based on the reduction mass (p = 0.75, p = 0.89, p = 0.23, and p = 0.07).
CONCLUSION: It is as safe to perform large-volume breast reductions in the morbidly obese patient with comorbidities as in anyone else.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626352     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d60f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Vertical Scar Versus Inverted-T Scar Reduction Mammaplasty: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zhipeng Li; Bei Qian; Zhenxing Wang; Jian Liu; Bin Wang; Ke Guo; Jiaming Sun
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  The expanded inframammary fold triangle: Improved results in large volume breast reductions.

Authors:  Karan Chopra; Kashyap Komarraju Tadisina; Alexandra Conde-Green; Devinder P Singh
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01

3.  Risk Factors for Complications after Reduction Mammoplasty: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Min-Xia Zhang; Chun-Ye Chen; Qing-Qing Fang; Ji-Hua Xu; Xiao-Feng Wang; Bang-Hui Shi; Li-Hong Wu; Wei-Qiang Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Predictive risk factors of complications in reduction mammoplasty-analysis of three different pedicles.

Authors:  Johanna Palve; Marika Kuuskeri; Tiina Luukkaala; Eija Suorsa
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-08

5.  Effect of Obesity on Complications in Short-Scar Breast Reduction: A Retrospective Study of 236 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Eleanor Rose Goldwasser Tomczyk; Ava Chappell; Nathaniel Erskine; Mustafa Akyurek
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 0.947

6.  Superiomedial Pedicle Breast Reduction for Gigantic Breast Hypertrophy: Experience in 341 Breasts and Suggested Safety Modifications.

Authors:  Roei Singolda; Gal Bracha; Tariq Zoabi; Arik Zaretski; Amir Inbal; Eyal Gur; Yoav Barnea; Ehud Arad
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Double-Unit Superomedio-Central (DUS) Pedicle Inverted-T Reduction Mammaplasty in Gigantomastia: A 7-year Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  A Wolter; S Fertsch; B Munder; P Stambera; T Schulz; M Hagouan; D Janku; K Staemmler; L Grueter; N Abu-Abdallah; K Becker; B Aufmesser; J Kornetka; C Andree
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.326

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.