Literature DB >> 18625760

Determinants of self-rated health items with different points of reference: implications for health measurement of older adults.

Kerry A Sargent-Cox1, Kaarin J Anstey, Mary A Luszcz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed whether three commonly used self-rated health (SRH) items (global, age-comparative, and self-comparative) are equivalent measures of health perception for older adults.
METHOD: Regression analyses were used to simultaneously contrast the associations between physical, psychological, and social factors relating to health for three SRH items, in a large ( N = 2,034) population-based sample of older adults (65 years and older) from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Aging.
RESULTS: Health perceptions were more positive for the age-comparative SRH measure, compared to the pessimistic ratings of the self-comparative measure, particularly for the oldest-old adults. Different patterns of associations between the health factors and SRH measures were found. DISCUSSION: These results show the three SRH items are not equivalent measures of health and cannot be used interchangeably. The reference point of the SRH item has a considerable influence on health perceptions of older adults as it encapsulates unique health information.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18625760     DOI: 10.1177/0898264308321035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aging Health        ISSN: 0898-2643


  27 in total

1.  Tracking cognition-health changes from 55 to 95 years of age.

Authors:  Brent J Small; Roger A Dixon; John J McArdle
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England.

Authors:  Anne Miles; Sandra Rainbow; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Population Aging and Health Trajectories at Older Ages.

Authors:  Eric M Vogelsang; James M Raymo; Jersey Liang; Erika Kobayashi; Taro Fukaya
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Self-rated health changes and oldest-old mortality.

Authors:  Eric M Vogelsang
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Exploring factors influencing residents' health outcomes in long-term care facilities: 1-year follow-up using latent growth curve model.

Authors:  Li-Fan Liu; Rhay-Hung Weng; Jiun-Yu Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Longitudinal Twin Study of Subjective Health: Differences in Genetic and Environmental Components of Variance Across Age and Sex.

Authors:  Deborah Finkel; Carol E Franz; Kaare Christensen; Chandra A Reynolds; Nancy L Pedersen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Five-factor personality traits and age trajectories of self-rated health: the role of question framing.

Authors:  Corinna E Löckenhoff; Antonio Terracciano; Luigi Ferrucci; Paul T Costa
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2012-02-18

8.  Testing covariates of Type 2 diabetes-cognition associations in older adults: moderating or mediating effects?

Authors:  G Peggy McFall; Bonnie P Geall; Ashley L Fischer; Sanda Dolcos; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Mild cognitive impairment is associated with selected functional markers: integrating concurrent, longitudinal, and stability effects.

Authors:  Sanda Dolcos; Stuart W S MacDonald; Anna Braslavsky; Richard Camicioli; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The choice of self-rated health measures matter when predicting mortality: evidence from 10 years follow-up of the Australian longitudinal study of ageing.

Authors:  Kerry A Sargent-Cox; Kaarin J Anstey; Mary A Luszcz
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.