Literature DB >> 18625583

Refinement: promoting the three Rs in practice.

M H Lloyd1, B W Foden, S E Wolfensohn.   

Abstract

Refinement of scientific procedures carried out on protected animals is an iterative process, which begins with a critical evaluation of practice. The process continues with objective assessment of the impact of the procedures, identification of areas for improvement, selection and implementation of an improvement strategy and evaluation of the results to determine whether there has been the desired effect, completing the refinement loop and resulting in the perpetuation of good practice. Refinements may be science-driven (those which facilitate getting high-quality results) or welfare-driven or may encompass both groups, but whatever the driver, refinements almost always result in benefits to both welfare and science. Refinements can be implemented in all aspects of animal use: improved methodology in invasive techniques, housing and husbandry, and even statistical analyses can all benefit animal welfare and scientific quality. If refinement is not actively sought, outdated and unnecessarily invasive techniques may not be replaced by better methods as they become available, and thus outdated information is passed down to the next generation, causing perpetuation of old-fashioned methods. This leads to a spiral of ignorance, leading ultimately to poor practice, poor animal welfare and poor-quality scientific data. Refinement is a legal and ethical requirement, yet refinements may not always be implemented. There are numerous obstacles to the implementation of refinement, which may be real or perceived. Either way, in order to take refinement forward, it is important to coordinate the approach to refinement, validate the science behind refinement, ensure there is adequate education and training in new techniques, improve liaison between users and make sure there is feedback on suitability of refinements for use. Overall, refinement requires a coordinated ongoing process of critical appraisal of practice and active scrutiny of resources for likely improvements. In the busy world of biomedical research, this process needs help. In order to develop these themes further, a workshop was held at the LASA Winter Meeting 2006, UK, to assist in identifying potential obstacles to refinement, and then to explore and develop strategies for overcoming these obstacles in key areas. A range of strategies appropriate to different circumstances was identified, which should facilitate the implementation of refinements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18625583     DOI: 10.1258/la.2007.007045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  12 in total

1.  The use of systematic reviews and reporting guidelines to advance the implementation of the 3Rs.

Authors:  Marc T Avey; Nicole Fenwick; Gilly Griffin
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Improving quality of science through better animal welfare: the NC3Rs strategy.

Authors:  Mark J Prescott; Katie Lidster
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 3.  Translational Sepsis Research: Spanning the Divide.

Authors:  Anthony J Lewis; Janet S Lee; Matthew R Rosengart
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Substitute of Animals in Drug Research: An Approach Towards Fulfillment of 4R's.

Authors:  T Arora; A K Mehta; V Joshi; K D Mehta; N Rathor; P K Mediratta; K K Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.975

5.  Survey of Canadian animal-based researchers' views on the Three Rs: replacement, reduction and refinement.

Authors:  Nicole Fenwick; Peter Danielson; Gilly Griffin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  To Group or Not to Group? Good Practice for Housing Male Laboratory Mice.

Authors:  Sarah Kappel; Penny Hawkins; Michael T Mendl
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Reducing Animal Use with a Biotelemetry-Enhanced Murine Model of Sepsis.

Authors:  Anthony Lewis; Brian Zuckerbraun; John Griepentrog; Xianghong Zhang; Matthew Rosengart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Researchers' attitudes to the 3Rs-An upturned hierarchy?

Authors:  Nuno Henrique Franco; Peter Sandøe; I Anna S Olsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ethics of primate use.

Authors:  M J Prescott
Journal:  Adv Sci Res       Date:  2010-11-12

10.  Preclinical Studies of the Biosafety and Efficacy of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Pre-Seeded into β-TCP Scaffolds after Transplantation.

Authors:  Mar Gonzálvez-García; Carlos M Martinez; Victor Villanueva; Ana García-Hernández; Miguel Blanquer; Luis Meseguer-Olmo; Ricardo E Oñate Sánchez; José M Moraleda; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.